you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Honor X9a reviews by real users Honor X9a
- 6.67"AMOLEDFHD+20:9
- 175 g73.9 mm161.6 mm7.9 mm
- SnapD. 695 Octa-Core 8 GB RAM 128 GB
- v10 425.000
- 5100 mAh
- 1 64 Mpx · ƒ/1.8 23SELF 16 Mpx · ƒ/2.45
- Android 12 Snow Cone Android 12
User score
- Screen8.2
- Performance7.0
- Camera7.2
- Connectivity8.2
- Battery9.0
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
3 reviews
3 reviews
3 reviews
3 reviews
Performance & Hardware
3 reviews
3 reviews
3 reviews
Camera
3 reviews
3 reviews
3 reviews
3 reviews
Connectivity
3 reviews
3 reviews
3 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 0%Less than a day
- 33%One day
- 0%More than one day
- 67%Two days or more
3 reviews
Software
- 0%It comes with a clean operating system
- 100%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 0%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
3 reviews
- 0%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 67%Every six months
- 33%Every two months or less
3 reviews
User reviews
- AutoMiddle peasant
The screen is good, they tried hard on it, the eyes don’t hurt at all, even at minimum brightness, the performance is also quite good, if you climb in social networks, then it’s enough with your head, the shell is good enough, it’s no different from emui 18 years old and older (if I don’t I don’t confuse), so if you previously owned a Huawei / Honor phone, it will be easy for you to start using this smartphone. The camera was disappointing, for a52, which cost the same, the photos are better than the honor. I didn’t like the sound either, the speaker is quiet and listening to anything through it is a real torment. Terrible noise reduction at the microphone, video and voice messages sound disgusting. In general, the phone is good, but it has its drawbacks that do not allow me to use it calmly, so in the near future I will look for a replacement, and it is unlikely that honor and huawei will become them.
Pros- Screen
- CPU
- Shell
- Google services
Cons- Microphone
- speaker
- Camera
View original review- 5.6
- Screen5.5
- Performance4.0
- Camera3.5
- Connectivity6.6
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- AnTuTu Version 3 months ago
- Name, Storage 7 months ago
- Version 7 months ago
- New opinion 10 months ago
- RAM 1 year ago
- Features 1 year ago
- AnTuTu 1 year ago
- Photos 1 year ago
- Version, Aliases, Usable surface, Camera, Camera, Camera, Selfie Camera, Flash, Screen Type, Camera, Sensor Type, Sensor Model, Camera, Camera, Sensor Model, Camera, Camera, Selfie Camera, Selfie Camera, Photos 1 year ago
- Name 1 year ago
Score
no Ki
- 8.1 Design & Materials
- 6.4 Performance & Hardware
- 5.9 Camera
- 6.8 Connectivity
- 8.1 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.