Motorola Moto E22 reviews by real users Motorola Moto E22
- 6.5"LCD IPSHD+20:9
- 172 g74.6 mm163.5 mm8.0 mm
- Helio G37 Octa-Core 3 GB RAM 32 GB
- 159.800 v10
- 4020 mAh 10 W
- 1 16 Mpx ƒ/2.2 2 2 Mpx ƒ/2.4 SELF 5 Mpx · ƒ/2.4
- Android 12 Snow Cone Android 12
User reviews
User score
Let me sum it up for you
Kimovil users believe this smartphone is suitable for basic use, highlighting its value for money and design. However, there's a general consensus about its limited performance, with frequent freezes and slowness, positioning it as a low-end device that fails to meet many users' expectations.
Design & Materials
According to our users, the 90Hz screen is a plus, although its performance limits its full utilization. Opinions on its quality and viewing angles are mixed.
20 reviews
20 reviews
20 reviews
20 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, performance is the weakest point, with an underpowered processor and poor optimization. It suffers from constant lags and freezes.
20 reviews
20 reviews
20 reviews
Camera
According to our users, the camera is acceptable for its price in daylight photography. Night photos and overall quality are heavily criticized.
20 reviews
20 reviews
20 reviews
20 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, connectivity is varied. Bluetooth works well, and 5G Wi-Fi is a plus, but many report instability and slowness.
20 reviews
20 reviews
20 reviews
Battery
According to our users, the battery offers decent autonomy for a day of normal use. However, opinions on its duration vary, with some considering it short.
- 5%Less than half day
- 50%Less than a day
- 25%One day
- 20%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
20 reviews
Software
- 25%It comes with a clean operating system
- 70%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 5%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
20 reviews
- 18%Never
- 18%Once a year
- 41%Every six months
- 24%Every two months or less
20 reviews
- AutoIt's only good for using basic apps, like WhatsApp, Instagram, or TikTok; it has little storage, freezes a lot, and is only good for sending messages.
It's only good for using basic apps, like WhatsApp, Instagram, or TikTok. It's not recommended for games up to 200MB; only one Supercell game lagged a lot. Overall rating 2/10, because the one I had didn't have 5G but 4G, although it usually showed 3G.
Pros- Good for basic apps.
- Work cell phone
- Beautiful appearance
Cons- Storage
- Fluidity
- Ram
- Less freezing
- Play more games
View original review- 3.1
- Screen5.5
- Performance2.3
- Camera6.7
- Connectivity5.3
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoIt can be better
The design is awesome, as is the touch sensor. It drops a bit in games, which is a bit annoying, but for the price, it's fine. I never use the camera, so I can't really comment, but the times I have used it, it's neither here nor there. I've had it for 11 months.
Pros- Good design
- Comfortable
- Good touch sensor
- For its price it justifies it
Cons- 90hz which cannot be used due to poor performance
- In games he is stuck
- You can save a little more and buy a better one.
View original review- 5.4
- Screen6.5
- Performance6.0
- Camera3.7
- Connectivity5.3
- Battery5.0
View answers - 6.5
- Screen5.7
- Performance7.0
- Camera6.0
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery5.0
View answers- AutoThe cell phone for the price range is fine
I've had the phone for several months now and this was my experience with the device. The phone is fine for normal day-to-day use, for social networks and all that is fine, but for demanding games I do not fully recommend this phone because it gets stuck and when I play demanding games like Call of Duty for example it overheats afterwards. The camera seems pretty good for the price which is less than 100 dollars. It takes pretty good daytime photos but not so good nighttime photos. The battery lasts all day for my daily use of social networks and playing once or twice a day.
View original review- 7
- Screen7.0
- Performance7.0
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoUnable to use
In terms of performance, it is without a doubt the worst cell phone I have ever owned. Not only is its chipset underpowered, but it is also very poorly optimized. With good software you can get the most out of a low-end cell phone, but this is not the case. It doesn't even stand out for its battery, something that other low-end cell phones at least do. There is not much more to comment on, the possible virtues it has (such as stereo audio, nice design and the functioning of the fingerprint reader) are overshadowed by the poor performance of the terminal, especially its 90hz screen that cannot be used due to poor optimization, it has constant application crashes.
Pros- Good construction
- High quality speakers
- Suitable cameras
Cons- Very low performance
- Poor optimization
- Application crashes
View original review- 4.8
- Screen6.7
- Performance3.0
- Camera4.7
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoGood, nice and cheap
The audio is perfect, it sounds very good, it has Dolby Atmos, I think that's what it's called. The camera is lacking, it's not very good, but for the price you can ask for it, if I'm not mistaken, the rear camera is 13 megapixels. In games it's average, there are games that it can run but they can be heavy. In terms of Wi-Fi, something didn't seem normal to me, and that's that on other phones the Wi-Fi worked very well and on this one it was slow. In conclusion, for its price, it's worth it for daily use, simple or even heavy games, and the audio is awesome.
Pros- Audio
- Battery
- Storage
Cons- The camera
- Wifi
View original review- 5
- Screen7.2
- Performance8.3
- Camera5.0
- Connectivity5.0
- Battery9.0
View answers - 4.4
- Screen6.7
- Performance5.0
- Camera5.7
- Connectivity4.0
- Battery5.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.