you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Motorola Moto E22 reviews by real users Motorola Moto E22
- 6.5"LCD IPSHD+20:9
- 172 g74.6 mm163.5 mm8.0 mm
- Helio G37 Octa-Core 3 GB RAM 32 GB
- v10 159.800
- 4020 mAh
- 1 16 Mpx · ƒ/2.2 2SELF 5 Mpx · ƒ/2.4
- Android 12 Snow Cone Android 12
User score
- 2
- 5
- 4
- 0
- 2
- Screen6.3
- Performance5.9
- Camera6.1
- Connectivity7.6
- Battery6.2
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
13 reviews
13 reviews
13 reviews
13 reviews
Performance & Hardware
13 reviews
13 reviews
13 reviews
Camera
13 reviews
13 reviews
13 reviews
13 reviews
Connectivity
13 reviews
13 reviews
13 reviews
Battery
- 8%Less than half day
- 38%Less than a day
- 31%One day
- 23%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
13 reviews
Software
- 31%It comes with a clean operating system
- 69%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 0%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
13 reviews
- 25%Never
- 17%Once a year
- 25%Every six months
- 33%Every two months or less
13 reviews
User reviews
- 4.4
- Screen6.7
- Performance5.0
- Camera5.7
- Connectivity4.0
- Battery5.0
View answers- AutoIt is a very good phone for both daily use and demanding use.
It is a very good phone in several aspects, both for everyday use for normal tasks and for slightly more demanding use. I have had it for 8 months and it does not present any problems in use.
Pros- A very nice saying
- A good performance
- A good cameras
- A decent battery life
Cons- Sometimes with the most demanding applications it can present small obstacles
View original review- 10
- Screen9.0
- Performance9.3
- Camera10
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoThe basics with a top-of-the-line look.
Acceptable for what it proposes. It serves me very well, even when playing games, and the battery easily lasts a day depending on usage. Even when I play, it usually lasts until the end of the day. In photos it does well, especially on the main camera. The selfie one isn't far behind, it manages to provide very acceptable quality. At night the quality drops and still remains good (Activate HDR when taking photos, it improves by 10x). However, it is noticeable that they could have included a better camera. The screen, despite being IPS, manages to have good quality, not only that but it is a 90hz screen which is extremely satisfactory. This issue of 90hz is a good idea because, due to the more limited processor, the refresh rate is hardly 90. In more basic use it is noticeable that it stays at 90 and in games they are more at 60. You cannot forget the 5g wifi which honestly makes this cell phone an excellent value for money and not only that, the stereo sound is simply perfect. Great sound quality, however, the quality of your microphone, especially in recordings, is not one of the best.
Pros- Elegant.
- 90hz screen.
- Wifi 5g.
- Battery.
- Audio quality.
Cons- Processor.
- Camera.
- Device resistance.
View original review- 7.2
- Screen5.0
- Performance7.3
- Camera6.7
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - 7.5
- Screen7.0
- Performance7.6
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery9.0
View answers- AutoGood for its price but the hardware power falls short
The back part is nice, the power is shit in demanding games and the screen is bad, its camera is not god, it's just there
Pros- price quality
- sound
- design
- fluency
Cons- gaming performance
- mediocre camera
- coverage
- screen with bad angles
View original review- 5.7
- Screen7.0
- Performance5.3
- Camera6.2
- Connectivity6.6
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoIt is a basic mobile phone, if you need something good for video, photography and games, this device is not it
It is a practically low-end mobile. For demanding games like: Pubg, Call of Duty, and other games with demanding graphics it is not. Its camera is not all that good, a basic camera. Its design is very nice on the back
Pros- Screen brightness
- Comfortable
- Pretty
- Motorola Features
Cons- Screen
- Camera
- Battery
- Burden
- Performance
View original review- 5
- Screen5.7
- Performance4.0
- Camera4.7
- Connectivity8.3
- Battery5.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 1 month ago
- Width, Height, Thickness, Weight, Usable surface, Selfie Camera 1 year ago
- Capacity (mAh), Fast charge, Features 1 year ago
- SIM card, SIM card 1 year ago
- Selfie Camera, Camera 1 year ago
- Version 1 year ago
- Name, RAM, Storage 1 year ago
- Version, Market 1 year ago
- Operating System 2 years ago
Score
- 5.6 Design & Materials
- 5.3 Performance & Hardware
- 5.0 Camera
- 5.9 Connectivity
- 5.1 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.