6.2

Motorola Moto E40 reviews by real users Motorola Moto E40

User reviews

User score

6.1
  • 3
  • 9
  • 3
  • 4
  • 1
20 reviews
  • Screen6.7
  • Performance5.8
  • Camera5.5
  • Connectivity7.0
  • Battery7.0
Do you want to share your opinion?

It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.

Design & Materials

Is it a drop-resistant and scratch-resistant smartphone?
7.0

20 reviews

Do you think it's a nice phone?
6.9

20 reviews

Is it comfortable?
7.9

20 reviews

Can you see it well in the sunlight?
4.8

20 reviews

Performance & Hardware

Does it have good sound?
6.2

20 reviews

Does it work smoothly in everyday use?
6.1

20 reviews

What's your experience been with demanding games?
5.1

20 reviews

Camera

Quality of daytime photos
6.1

20 reviews

Quality of nighttime photos
4.4

20 reviews

Quality of selfies
5.3

20 reviews

Does it have a powerful flash?
6.4

20 reviews

Connectivity

Does it have good coverage for calls?
6.9

20 reviews

Quality of the GPS
7.2

20 reviews

And the WiFi?
7.0

20 reviews

Battery

How long does the battery last?
  • 10%
    Less than half day
  • 25%
    Less than a day
  • 5%
    One day
  • 60%
    More than one day
  • 0%
    Two days or more

20 reviews

Software

Did it come with preinstalled applications?
  • 10%
    It comes with a clean operating system
  • 85%
    It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
  • 5%
    It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall

20 reviews

Do you regularly receive updates?
  • 21%
    Never
  • 26%
    Once a year
  • 47%
    Every six months
  • 5%
    Every two months or less

20 reviews

View more

All 20 opinions

  • Alright

    Is good phone but sometimes it crashes and when i play games the clock and battery bar pops out

    Pros
    • Battery
    • Camera pretty alright
    Cons
    • Glitches
    • Bugs
    • Android 11
    • 7.6
    • Screen7.2
    • Performance7.3
    • Camera7.7
    • Connectivity8.0
    • Battery9.0
  • Great performance with one big caveat

    I am a 14-year-old geek and bought this phone in September. The main objective I had was to buy a phone with the highest AnTuTu score and an IPS screen. I chose this over Samsung M12 (much worse AnTuTu, bit better software) and realme narzo 50i prime (FHD+ screen, but with worse AnTuTu).
    First, the software. This phone comes with clean Android 11 (it has done Motorola additions, but not as much as Samsung for example). This also means less bloatware. It has only some Google apps, most of which you can uninstall if you want. It runs great and had no stutters in everyday use and short intense gaming sessions.
    Now for the hardware. The fingerprint reader is great, a longer tap turns the phone on. Also it's great that the phone can be sleeping (screen turned off) for the fingerprint to work. Next up, the cameras. The main rear one is great in light and medium environments, but struggles in low light as one could expect from a really cheap phone. I hate the cameras setup though: the DoF camera, which is only used to blur the background in portrait shots. The problem is that the same can be achieved by software and it's achieved in front camera portrait shots. Also, the macro camera is just too low in resolution and too grainy to want to take photos with it. Other than that, it's great. One can choose between 48MP and 12MP modes. The front camera is great quality, one can take an occasional selfie with it. There is a physical button to call Google assistant which I don't use. The microphone quality is great, the earpiece speaker also, but the main speaker is just bad. There's no other word for it. This phone had USB-C charging at 10W and a headphone jack at the top. The proximity sensor and notification diode both work great. The battery level at the end of an intense day (6hrs screen on time) is about 5-15%. I'm using it with a microSD and SIM card, no stutters it whatever, ejecting the card is great and always works.
    Hope you have a wonderful day today!

    Pros
    • CPU
    • GPU
    • Screen colors
    • Bear in mind that because there are more cons than
    • Pros doesn't mean it's a bad phone
    Cons
    • Only 2.4GHz Wi-Fi
    • Rear camera setup
    • Resolution (could be FHD)
    • Slow charging
    • Screen brightness
    • 9.5
    • Screen7.5
    • Performance8.3
    • Camera7.5
    • Connectivity7.3
    • Battery9.0
  • AnTuTu v9 208880 so it's real good at this price

    • 8.9
    • Screen8.7
    • Performance7.0
    • Camera6.5
    • Connectivity8.0
    • Battery9.0
  • Auto
    she could handle it

    Pros
    • Battery
    • 90Hz screen
    • It does the basics
    Cons
    • It doesn't run very demanding games
    • 7
    • Screen7.5
    • Performance6.3
    • Camera7.0
    • Connectivity7.0
    • Battery9.0
  • Auto
    Good cell phone

    Pros
    • The battery
    • Fluent
    • Price
    • Rearview camera
    Cons
    • It needs updating.
    • Selfie camera
    • RAM memory
    • 6.2
    • Screen7.0
    • Performance6.0
    • Camera6.2
    • Connectivity6.3
    • Battery7.0
  • Auto
    It's good, although it's old.

    At the time it was worth it just for the basics, although the camera was decent and for the price it was good.

    • 7.1
    • Screen8.0
    • Performance7.3
    • Camera6.0
    • Connectivity7.3
    • Battery9.0
  • Auto
    Very bad, it gets stuck a lot

    • 2.2
    • Screen4.2
    • Performance1.3
    • Camera3.2
    • Connectivity7.0
    • Battery0.0
  • Auto
    Bad Device in Full 2025

    If the hardware is the weakest factor, it's not recommended at all. The worst of all would be its audio quality and the screen design, which promises to be Full HD, but honestly, it's not noticeable at all. It doesn't even perform as a low-end phone.

    • 1.4
    • Screen1.5
    • Performance0.0
    • Camera1.7
    • Connectivity2.3
    • Battery5.0
  • Auto
    Good, pretty and cheap

    Pros
    • Battery
    • Operating system
    • 120hz display
    Cons
    • Camera
    • Fluency
    • 7
    • Screen5.2
    • Performance7.3
    • Camera4.7
    • Connectivity10
    • Battery9.0
  • Auto
    Good cell phone for undemanding tasks

    I had it for more than two years, and the phone had been lagging for about a year now, and the touch screen itself was very bad. It is not suitable for gaming and is a very cheap entry-level device.

    Pros
    • Price
    • Rear Camera
    • Design
    • Battery
    Cons
    • Processor
    • Very bad at games
    • Little fluid
    • Little customizable
    • Front Camera
    • 4.5
    • Screen5.7
    • Performance3.3
    • Camera6.0
    • Connectivity8.6
    • Battery5.0

This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.

Last update
February 9, 2026
State
  • Rumor
  • Presell
  • New
  • On Sale
Latest changes
  • New opinion 4 months ago
  • Name, RAM, Storage 1 year ago
  • Version 1 year ago
6.2
Ki Cost-effective
Score
  • 5.2 Design & Materials
  • 5.2 Performance & Hardware
  • 5.5 Camera
  • 5.3 Connectivity
  • 6.2 Battery
What is a Ki score?
Ki is an automatic score based on the specifications and prices of devices. It is calculated using over 200 variables to rank smartphones, tablets and other devices from best to worst.
How do we calculate the Ki?

In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:

  • Design and screen
  • Hardware and performance
  • Camera
  • Connectivity
  • Battery

Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.

Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.

Does the Ki score change?

The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.