you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Motorola Moto G Play (2023) reviews by real users Motorola Moto G Play (2023)
- 6.5"LCD IPSHD+20:9
- 203 g76.5 mm167.2 mm9.4 mm
- Helio G37 Octa-Core 3 GB RAM 32 GB
- 159.800 v10
- 5000 mAh 10 W
- 1 16 Mpx ƒ/2.2 2 2 Mpx ƒ/2.4 3 2 Mpx ƒ/2.4 SELF 5 Mpx · ƒ/2.4
- Android 12 Snow Cone Android 12
User reviews
User score
- Screen8.0
- Performance5.0
- Camera3.8
- Connectivity7.1
- Battery8.0
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
- Not a bad phone for kids, wouldn't recommend for daily use though.
I bought this phone a little bit ago on Verizon, and I've had a pretty meh experience with it. At the place I bought it (Dollar General), the phone retailed for $69, which doesn't seem too bad compared to other phones available for purchase at my location. Unfortunately, the mediocre price is quickly justified once you get the device out of the box. The first thing I noticed was the absolutely massive chin underneath the display that bothered me quite a bit, but again, $69 isn't a lot of money when it comes to making phones. Unfortunately, build quality on this unit is very poor. I have several instances where I have noticed audible creaking and just a really loose feeling while holding the phone. The display quality is also quite poor, peaking at 720p, 500nits. On the more positive side, the battery in this unit is absolutely stellar. I can start the day at around 10:30 with 100% battery, and with light to medium usage (Streaming YouTube videos, occasional picture taking, occasional phone calls, etc), by the time I get home at 19:00, I have around 20% to spare. To put it simply, the battery in the unit is better than my primary device (Samsung Galaxy A35 5G). On the audio part of things, this phone does feature a 3.5mm headphone jack on top of the device, which you might want to use because the on-board speaker on this phone has genuinely made my ears hurt at full volume.
Pros- Stellar battery
- Decent fingerprint reader
- "Meh" display
Cons- Very poor build quality
- Disappointing cameras
- Underwhelming performance
- Forced activation on Verizon
- 6.3
- Screen7.7
- Performance4.6
- Camera3.7
- Connectivity4.6
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 3 days ago
- Features 3 years ago
- Version 3 years ago
- Usable surface, Camera, Camera, Camera, Camera, Selfie Camera, Selfie Camera, Fast charge, RAM, Storage, Sensor Model, Camera, Camera, Camera, Selfie Camera, Fingerprint, Photos, Photos 3 years ago
- Name, Width, Height, Thickness, Weight, Market 3 years ago
Score
no Ki
- 5.5 Design & Materials
- 5.3 Performance & Hardware
- 5.5 Camera
- 6.7 Connectivity
- 6.1 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
