you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Motorola Moto G200 5G reviews by real users Motorola Moto G200 5G
- Ki Cost-effective Score7.8
- Kimovil reviewPros
- Battery
- Camera quality
- Gaming experience
- Sound
Cons- Weight
- No MicroSD slot
- 6.8"LCD IPSFHD+21:9
- 202 g75.5 mm168.1 mm8.9 mm
- SnapD. 888+ Octa-Core 8 GB RAM 128 GB
- v10 916.600
- 5000 mAh
- 1 108 Mpx · ƒ/1.9 S5KHM2 23SELF 16 Mpx · ƒ/2.2
- Android 12 Snow Cone Android 12
User score
- 22
- 1
- 5
- 1
- 0
- Screen7.3
- Performance8.9
- Camera7.9
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery6.8
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
29 reviews
29 reviews
29 reviews
29 reviews
Performance & Hardware
29 reviews
29 reviews
29 reviews
Camera
29 reviews
29 reviews
29 reviews
29 reviews
Connectivity
29 reviews
29 reviews
29 reviews
Battery
- 10%Less than half day
- 21%Less than a day
- 31%One day
- 24%More than one day
- 14%Two days or more
29 reviews
Software
- 24%It comes with a clean operating system
- 69%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 7%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
29 reviews
- 13%Never
- 17%Once a year
- 50%Every six months
- 21%Every two months or less
29 reviews
User reviews
- AutoQuality price
Very good cell phone with its pure Android, very fluid and the games go excellent although it does not support ultra graphics, it is still an excellent option to play with its 120hz screen, the bad thing is that the screen is not its strong point and it does not have room to put more memory and the screen does not look very good if you see it from the side. and the charger usually gets blocked by the slightest drop of water. It is annoying
Pros- Battery
- Performance
- Optimization
- Nice
Cons- Cheap materials
- Screen
- Charging pin
- Non-expandable memory
- Without headphone jack
View original review- 4.8
- Screen4.2
- Performance7.3
- Camera3.5
- Connectivity9.6
- Battery0.0
View answers - AutoAppalling!!
I changed from a Xiaomi that lasted me 4 years, this one and the first fall of 20 cm with glass broke the whole screen, during the day you can't see anything on the screen, mediocre photo bed, you take a photo and it takes a long time to load on WhatsApp, the battery doesn't last at all, it overheats!! I regret changing brands, very bad phone
View original review- 2.4
- Screen3.5
- Performance8.0
- Camera5.7
- Connectivity7.3
- Battery0.0
View answers - AutoIt is an amazing mobile for daily use
Very good in terms of resistance and fluidity conservation, its system is clean, the only thing is that when trying to record the screen or convert videos in high quality, even when charging it, it gets too hot, so I had to use a cooler to control its temperatures, in the emulator it is super stable and the ready for cable works very well...
Pros- 144hz display
- Fluency
- Good colors screen
- Good ram management
- Ready for cable
Cons- High temperatures
- Drains battery
- It doesn't have a stereo speaker
- I don't know if it's updated
View original review- 9.1
- Screen9.0
- Performance9.0
- Camera9.2
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoI do not recommend it for 2024
Decent processor, bad battery, fast charging, bad cameras, you can play without much problem, but the screen is bad because it is IPS, it tries to compensate with the Hz, but I would prefer AMOLED to 120, it no longer updates, it stayed on Android 12
Pros- 144hz frequency
- It has HDR
- Clean System
- Decent Processor
Cons- Cameras
- Updates
- Battery
View original review- 5
- Screen4.0
- Performance8.3
- Camera4.5
- Connectivity7.3
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoResistant and powerful.
Excellent device for work, very durable and good battery although it deteriorates quickly if there is little signal in the area. In full sun you can't see the screen very well.
Pros- Endurance
- Battery
- Cameras
- Fast charge
- Hardware
Cons- Low screen brightness
- To send photos on WhatsApp, you usually check
- Quite heavy
View original review- 8.9
- Screen7.0
- Performance7.3
- Camera7.7
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - 8.5
- Screen7.2
- Performance10
- Connectivity8.6
- Battery10
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 2 months ago
- Name, Storage 6 months ago
- Version 6 months ago
- Features 11 months ago
- Camera 2 years ago
- Operating System 2 years ago
Score
- 6.4 Design & Materials
- 7.3 Performance & Hardware
- 7.4 Camera
- 8.2 Connectivity
- 6.9 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.