you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Motorola Moto G30 reviews by real users Motorola Moto G30
- 6.5"LCD IPSHD+20:9
- 200 g75.7 mm165.2 mm9.2 mm
- SnapD. 662 Octa-Core 4 GB RAM 128 GB
- v8 170.968
- 5000 mAh
- 1 64.4 Mpx · ƒ/1.7 234SELF 13 Mpx · ƒ/2.2
- Android 11 Red Velvet Cake Android 11
User score
- 9
- 5
- 3
- 0
- 0
- Screen7.9
- Performance7.1
- Camera8.0
- Connectivity7.8
- Battery9.2
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
17 reviews
17 reviews
17 reviews
17 reviews
Performance & Hardware
17 reviews
17 reviews
17 reviews
Camera
17 reviews
17 reviews
17 reviews
17 reviews
Connectivity
17 reviews
17 reviews
17 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 6%Less than a day
- 0%One day
- 53%More than one day
- 41%Two days or more
17 reviews
Software
- 24%It comes with a clean operating system
- 71%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 6%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
17 reviews
- 0%Never
- 7%Once a year
- 36%Every six months
- 57%Every two months or less
17 reviews
User reviews
- Budget Phone!
Don't expect much, has good battery life and gets through messaging and browsing, if that's all you want.
Multitasking is so-so- budget phone.
Don't play games so can't comment.
Camera - all cameras (main, wide, selfie) miss focus at times even in bright, night is tough. Acceptable, maybe.Pros- Battery
- Plastic, so light
- Price
Cons- Camera
- Storage Speed
- 5
- Screen5.5
- Performance6.3
- Camera5.5
- Connectivity8.3
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoMotorola always leaves a lot to be desired
I would have changed the 90Hz screen for a 60Hz one in the range that is removing the NFC but adding stereo speakers which would be something unique for its range and would offer a better multimedia experience. Motorola at this point should better optimize the software's connectivity range and more extra configurations and bring better customization capabilities because having such a basic device is not a plus, at least on this cell phone it is no longer a problem to be receiving an update at once well for Motorola. The processor is not bad but the poor software optimization makes it lousy
Pros- Battery
- Acceptable design
- Screen in its range
- 5g wifi
- Connectivity
- Camera
Cons- Sound
- Height
- Weight 200g
- Fluency
- Android 12 with 11 is more than fine
- Optimization and software layer
View original review- 7
- Screen6.7
- Performance6.3
- Camera6.7
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery10
View answers - 4.1
- Screen4.7
- Performance1.6
- Camera10
- Connectivity6.3
- Battery9.0
View answers- AutoIt's good, but only at the beginning or if it's used for basic things
I bought this phone when it was just released for about $33,000 Argentine pesos, which is equivalent to about $200-250 dollars, since I was looking for a decent and cheap option. The first few months it worked great, but as the months went by it got much worse. Approximately after 6 months the battery began to degrade very quickly, at first it lasted more than a day but now it doesn't last half and it also overheats and gets stuck a lot with any application or even on the home screen but with what The one that gets stuck the most is with games especially, regardless of whether it is a demanding game or not. Likewise, something good to highlight is the camera, if you install another one that is not the one that comes by default, it works very well, especially for recording videos because it can be recorded at 1080p 60fps. The internet connection is not very good but it is not exaggeratedly bad either, it is to be expected for the price it has, as well as the GPS which, although I did not use it much, was not bad. I only recommend this cell phone if it is going to be used in a basic way such as making calls, sending messages, taking photos, etc. because for games there are better options than this, cheaper, with better performance and a screen like the samsung galaxy s20 fe since today the moto g30 costs more than $500 dollars (at least in Argentina) and is very expensive for the quality what's wrong with it.
Pros- The camera (not the one that comes by default)
- Design
- The interface can be modified a lot
- The battery (if not used much)
- space, 128GB
Cons- the processor
- The 4GB of RAM
- The screen
- The button for the Google assistant
- The battery (degrades with a lot of use)
View original review- 6.5
- Screen7.7
- Performance3.3
- Camera6.7
- Connectivity6.3
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoNot bad though
The cell phone is fine, it has a nice design and the cameras section is more than good, but there are things that leave this cell phone somewhat short, such as the processor, it would have been fine with one that has an antutu of 300,000, since if I it works well in certain games and apps but it lags a bit with very demanding games, the screen, even if it is LCD, would also have been fine with an FHD+ resolution or with an Amoled one, the 4GB of Ram, the night photos and the load, the rest is fine, which makes a slightly promising cell phone
Pros- 5000mAh battery
- Camera + Selfie
- The 128GB of storage
- drop resistant
- device design
Cons- The little ram it has
- Somewhat short processor
- Intermediate load of 20W
- Low resolution LCD display
- It is not IP68 certified
View original review- 7.1
- Screen9.0
- Performance7.3
- Camera8.5
- Connectivity8.6
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoSimple, but it's a good device
I already have this Motorola G30 for 5 months and the truth is, it's not that bad. If it fulfills its purpose very well, the photo quality is nice (as with the Selfie camera), it records at 1080p, and the battery at 10. My only complaint would be that the screen is only HD + (apart from being IPS) but what saves it would be its 90Hz that everything runs smoothly depending on what content you are watching. A low mid-range that did not disappoint me. 8/10
Pros- 5000mAh battery
- cameras
- 128GB of space
- 90Hz fluency
- nice design
Cons- HD+ only screen
- 20W average load
- The imprint on the back
View original review- 7.9
- Screen7.7
- Performance7.6
- Camera8.2
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoGood device depending on the price at which it is purchased
My experience with the Motorola G30 is good, the device has good performance in games and applications, the camera is quite good, but if you install the Google camera, it's much better, with the battery I don't have, which is good, what I like least about it The cell phone's screen has very little brightness and also its internet connection is somewhat poor for the price.
Pros- Performance
- Camera
- With few factory apps
Cons- Screen has very low brightness
View original review- 8.5
- Screen8.0
- Performance8.0
- Camera7.7
- Connectivity6.3
- Battery9.0
View answers - 9.1
- Screen9.5
- Performance8.6
- Camera7.7
- Connectivity8.3
- Battery10
View answers- AutoI love
Super Motorola the software monitoring is great the camera is much better than some Xiaomi of the Poco X3 or the redmi note 10s genre it has everything of a Google pixel we found it the autonomy is monstrous and Legé phone in short all good
Pros- Screen
- Camera
- Drums
- Software monitoring
- Fluidity
Cons- That HD +
- No stereo
View original review- 10
- Screen10
- Performance10
- Camera10
- Connectivity10
- Battery10
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 2 months ago
- AnTuTu Version 1 year ago
- AnTuTu 1 year ago
- Version 2 years ago
Score
- 5.2 Design & Materials
- 5.6 Performance & Hardware
- 6.0 Camera
- 6.5 Connectivity
- 7.0 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.