you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Motorola Moto G84 reviews by real users Motorola Moto G84
- Ki Cost-effective Score8
- Kimovil reviewPros
- Battery
- Design
- Price
Cons- Camera quality
- 6.5"pOLEDFHD+20:9
- 167 g74.4 mm160.0 mm7.6 mm
- SnapD. 695 Octa-Core 12 GB RAM 256 GB
- v10 424.100
- 5000 mAh
- 1 50 Mpx · ƒ/1.88 2SELF 16 Mpx · ƒ/2.45
- Android 13 Tiramisu Android 13
User score
- 10
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 0
- Screen8.8
- Performance8.7
- Camera6.8
- Connectivity9.7
- Battery8.5
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
12 reviews
12 reviews
12 reviews
12 reviews
Performance & Hardware
12 reviews
12 reviews
12 reviews
Camera
12 reviews
12 reviews
12 reviews
12 reviews
Connectivity
12 reviews
12 reviews
12 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 8%Less than a day
- 17%One day
- 58%More than one day
- 17%Two days or more
12 reviews
Software
- 17%It comes with a clean operating system
- 83%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 0%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
12 reviews
- 0%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 83%Every six months
- 17%Every two months or less
12 reviews
User reviews
- AutoIt is an elegant phone, very fluid and with good connectivity.
My family uses Motorola so I also decided to switch, this G84 is good, it has a good design, a loud sound, a large internal memory and its battery, but the cameras are of poor quality and also its pure system, which I feel is missing more options for customize the equipment well. But it is a good device.
Pros- Its synthetic leather design
- stereo sound
- Your LED screen
- Its 256GB storage
- Useful cameras (main and Ultra wide)
- Ready For and Gestures
Cons- Cameras and video recording
- Low audio on external devices
- More security (blocking apps, notifications
- More customization options
- Only one year of android update
View original review- 8.5
- Screen9.7
- Performance9.5
- Camera8.2
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoNice and cheap, for casual user
The design steals attention, the screen is excellent and I love the way it sounds. Its performance is good for not very demanding games. The battery lasts a day and a half, and it charges very quickly. The camera is the only weak point of this device.
Pros- Battery duration
- Design
- Screen
- Sound
Cons- The camera
View original review- 8.9
- Screen9.5
- Performance8.3
- Camera8.0
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoA great cell phone, considering its specifications, outstanding in terms of screen and sound quality
Cell phone with relatively good power, runs some games with good graphic quality, reaching a maximum of 44°C on an average of 41°C in terms of temperature. Camera issue, in photos it is quite pleasant, considering the 50 MPX, with OIS (Optical Stabilization) which helps the image to have more quality in a way, but the disappointing thing is its 2 MPX Macro/Ultra Wide , what could be better, and when recording, it is disappointing, presenting noise and taking into account FHD recording. In terms of audio, you have nothing to complain about, as Dolby Atmos with Hi-Res and Spatial Sound provides enormous sound quality on any occasion.
Pros- Multimedia
- Screen
Cons- Camera
View original review- 8.6
- Screen8.7
- Performance9.0
- Camera7.7
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery5.0
View answers - 9.3
- Screen9.7
- Performance10
- Camera8.2
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery9.0
View answers- 8
- Screen8.2
- Performance8.0
- Camera6.5
- Connectivity9.6
- Battery9.0
View answers- Autosuper good for the price
big surprise on this Motorola smartphone, very fluid in daily use and even with 120 Hz the autonomy is excellent with two days or more thank you the pOLED screen and the performance is very stable but it struggles with big games like honkai star rail which is a shame because more performance with a 1080 dimension from Mediatek otherwise I recommend this phone it surprised me, sound quality, fluidity and autonomy.
Pros- good overall
Cons- virtual ram
View original review- 9
- Screen9.0
- Performance7.0
- Camera5.0
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery10
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 7 days ago
- Pros & Cons 1 month ago
- Features 2 months ago
- Version 4 months ago
- RAM 6 months ago
- Name, Usable surface 7 months ago
- Aliases, Inches, Fast charge, Market 7 months ago
- On Sale 7 months ago
- Density 7 months ago
- Photos, Photos 7 months ago
Score
- 7.5 Design & Materials
- 7.0 Performance & Hardware
- 6.2 Camera
- 7.9 Connectivity
- 7.6 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.