you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Motorola Signature reviews by real users motorola Signature
- 6.78"AMOLEDQHD20:9
- 186 g76.4 mm162.1 mm7.0 mm
- SnapD. 8 Gen5 Octa-Core 12 GB RAM 256 GB
- 3.081.179 v11
- 5200 mAh 90 W ~ 52h
- 1 50 Mpx ƒ/1.6 2 50 Mpx ƒ/2.0 3 50 Mpx ƒ/2.2 SELF 50 Mpx · ƒ/2.0
- Android 16 Android 16
User reviews
User score
- 5
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
- Screen9.8
- Performance10
- Camera9.2
- Connectivity9.7
- Battery7.8
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
5 reviews
5 reviews
5 reviews
5 reviews
Performance & Hardware
5 reviews
5 reviews
5 reviews
Camera
5 reviews
5 reviews
5 reviews
5 reviews
Connectivity
5 reviews
5 reviews
5 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 0%Less than a day
- 60%One day
- 40%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
5 reviews
Software
- 40%It comes with a clean operating system
- 60%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 0%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
5 reviews
- 0%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 0%Every six months
- 100%Every two months or less
5 reviews
- Confiável e entrega muito para o preço
Sensores das câmeras são atuais, com a opção mais avançada para cada tamanho de sensor usada. Na área de bateria usa silício-carbono, boa capacidade mesmo com um corpo muito fino e fantástica velocidade de carregamento. Em conectividade tem as últimas tecnologias, wifi 7 triband, bluetooth 6.0 com últimos recursos de localização usando UWB integrado e IA otimizando o consumo. O sistema é fluido e bem integrado com recursos de IA. Poderia ser melhor se tivesse mais recursos no editor de fotos e utilizasse uma galeria de fotos independente do Google Fotos.
Pros- Sensores de câmeras modernos e todos com 50MP
- Bateria de silício-carbono e carregamento a 90W
- Vídeo gravado em Dolby Vision 10bit
- WiFi7 Triband + Bluetooth 6 + UWB
- AI Zoom acima da média
- "Ajuste com IA" no editor de fotos funciona bem
Cons- Não tem galeria de fotos própria, usa o Google Fotos
- Não tem editor de fotos próprio, usa Google Fotos
- Instagram não tira proveito de fotos UltraHDR aqui
- Tem o RAW comum, mas poderia ter "UltraRAW" extra
- Falta opção de HSL no editor de fotos
- Falta LOG e RAW Video 10/12/14bit com DCG
- 9.8
- Screen9.7
- Performance10
- Camera9.5
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoReliable and delivers a lot for the price.
The camera sensors are up-to-date, with the most advanced option for each sensor size used. The battery uses silicon-carbon, offering good capacity despite its very thin body and fantastic charging speed. Connectivity features include the latest technologies: tri-band Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6.0 with the latest location features using integrated UWB, and AI optimizing power consumption. The system is fluid and well-integrated with AI features. It could be better if it had more features in the photo editor and used a photo gallery independent of Google Photos.
Pros- Modern camera sensors, all with 50MP.
- Silicon-carbon battery and 90W charging.
- Video recorded in Dolby Vision 10-bit.
- WiFi7 Triband + Bluetooth 6 + UWB
- Above-average AI Zoom
- "AI adjustment" in the photo editor works well.
Cons- It doesn't have its own photo gallery; it uses Google Photos.
- It doesn't have its own photo editor; it uses Google Photos.
- Instagram doesn't take advantage of UltraHDR photos here.
- It has the standard RAW mode, but it could have an extra "UltraRAW" option.
- The photo editor lacks an HSL option.
- Missing LOG and RAW Video 10/12/14bit with DCG
View original review- 9.9
- Screen9.7
- Performance10
- Camera10
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoIt doesn't deserve a Gold dxomark seal.
I bought it intending to use it for gaming and photography. Unfortunately, I was misled regarding the photography. The selfie camera doesn't even take acceptable photos in good light; I tested it next to a regular S23, and the S23 performed better. It uses a lot of AI to try and improve the image quality, which is already terrible, but the AI can't capture a single detail and turns faces into blurry drawings. I wasn't disappointed with night photos, as almost all phones are terrible at night, just like this one, but the selfie camera surprised me negatively.
Pros- Screen
- Rear daytime running camera
- Battery
- In-game performance
Cons- Selfie camera
View original review- 9.2
- Screen10
- Performance10
- Camera7.7
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoExtremely eye-catching and lightweight design.
The camera is excellent, although it does struggle a bit with noise in nighttime photos, and this is more noticeable in video. However, for the price, it's perfect, to the point that there's hardly any noticeable difference compared to an iPhone 17 Pro Max or a Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra. Its weight feels incredibly light, and if I had to buy it, it would be even better. In all other aspects, it's as complete as any premium phone you'd expect.
Pros- Lightweight
- Performance
- Battery
- Operating System
- Screen
- Camera
Cons- Photos at night
- Video at night
View original review- 9.9
- Screen10
- Performance10
- Camera9.7
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 1 month ago
- Features 3 months ago
- Name 4 months ago
- Sensor Model, Sensor Model, Selfie Camera 4 months ago
- Sensor Model 4 months ago
- Photos 4 months ago
- SAR, SAR 4 months ago
- Inches 4 months ago
- Version 4 months ago
- Storage 4 months ago
Score
no Ki
- 9.5 Design & Materials
- 8.7 Performance & Hardware
- 8.4 Camera
- 8.6 Connectivity
- 7.4 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
