you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
POCO C40 reviews by real users POCO C40
- "Ki" Value for Money Score6.4
- Pros
- Battery
- Coverage
- Price
Cons- Camera quality
- Selfie camera
- Slow SOC
- System lag
- 6.71"LCD IPSHD+20:9
- 204 g76.6 mm169.6 mm9.2 mm
- JR510 Octa-Core 4 GB RAM 64 GB
- 128.944 v9
- 6000 mAh 18 W
- 1 13 Mpx ƒ/1.8 2 2 Mpx ƒ/2.4 SELF 5 Mpx · ƒ/2.2
- Android 11 Red Velvet Cake MIUI V13 (Android 11)
User reviews
User score
- 1
- 3
- 1
- 4
- 2
- Screen5.7
- Performance4.5
- Camera4.4
- Connectivity7.3
- Battery8.2
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Let me sum it up for you
Kimovil users believe it's a phone with good value for money, ideal for basic use or for the elderly. However, many consider it slow and incomplete for its price, although some highlight its durability and the low cost of its spare parts.
Design & Materials
According to our users, opinions on the screen are varied; some rate it positively, highlighting its durability, while others consider it a weak point.
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, performance is slow and the phone heats up easily, making it unsuitable for demanding games or intensive daily use.
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
Camera
According to our users, the camera is one of the phone's biggest weaknesses, described as mediocre, bad, or producing very blurry photos.
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, the phone features an independent SD slot, in addition to the two nano-SIM slots, which is a plus.
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
Battery
According to our users, the battery is the device's strongest point, offering excellent duration that can exceed a day and a half of use.
- 0%Less than half day
- 9%Less than a day
- 36%One day
- 27%More than one day
- 27%Two days or more
11 reviews
Software
- 0%It comes with a clean operating system
- 70%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 30%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
11 reviews
- 40%Never
- 20%Once a year
- 30%Every six months
- 10%Every two months or less
11 reviews
- AutoLots of ads in pre-installed apps, slows down
I used it for three years: the ads were extremely annoying, the system lags, apps keep unloading, heavy games are impossible to play, there's no multitasking, and MIUI's proprietary Game Turbo is simply disabled: it's nowhere to be found in the system, but it did pop up once by accident. The battery is large, but not particularly long-lasting, charging is slow, and the phone gets very hot. The screen is dim and hard to see in sunlight. For the price (7,000 in DNS at the time of purchase), I don't recommend it; it's very uncomfortable to use, to say the least.
Pros- Battery
Cons- System
- Charger
- Manufacturer
View original review- 2.2
- Screen6.2
- Performance4.0
- Camera6.5
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoThis phone is terrible for everyday use; it has a very slow system and no longer receives updates.
I've had this phone for two years now, and the battery doesn't last as long as it's supposed to. It gets extremely hot even with minimal use, and it's not very good for the price. There are better phones out there.
View original review- 1.3
- Screen5.0
- Performance3.3
- Camera6.2
- Connectivity7.3
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoIt's a good phone, I've had it for 3 years, I bought it when it came out.
The phone is very good in quality price. The spare parts such as screen, battery, etc. are very cheap to change, the screen can be completely broken and it will not go black or not respond... The truth is that I loved it. It is not a high-end phone but for its price it is great.
Pros- Battery ,***
- Screen
- Burden
- Sound
- Aesthetics
- Fingerprint
Cons- Camera
- No longer receiving updates
- No demanding game
View original review- 8.6
- Screen8.5
- Performance6.0
- Camera0.0
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoFunctional.....
The truth is that it is a phone that is good for an older person or someone who does not need much use of a phone, because in games it is very slow, and it is also very incomplete for the price it offers, the camera is mediocre but its battery is very good, really.
Pros- Battery
- Price
Cons- Very slow
- Camera
- Software
- Does not include case
- Screen
View original review- 3.8
- Screen7.0
- Performance7.0
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - 1.4
- Screen4.5
- Performance2.0
- Camera2.7
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery10
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 25 days ago
- Pros & Cons 3 years ago
- Features 3 years ago
- AnTuTu Version 3 years ago
- AnTuTu 3 years ago
- On Sale 4 years ago
- Version 4 years ago
- Market 4 years ago
- Name, RAM, Storage 4 years ago
- Operating System 4 years ago
Score
- 5.4 Design & Materials
- 5.5 Performance & Hardware
- 5.4 Camera
- 6.1 Connectivity
- 7.7 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
