you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Opinions from the POCO F4 5G
Price comparison
New: deals from $ 310
Prices
In 5 stores
- 6.67"AMOLEDFHD+20:9
- 195 g 75.9 mm 163.2 mm 7.7 mm
- SnapD. 870 Octa-Core 6 GB RAM 128 GB
- v9 715.000
- 4500 mAh
- 1 64 Mpx · ƒ/1.79 OV64B 23SELF 20 Mpx · ƒ/2.4
- Android 13 Tiramisu MIUI 14 (Android 13)
User score
- 24
- 0
- 1
- 0
- 0
- Screen9.0
- Performance9.5
- Camera8.8
- Connectivity9.6
- Battery7.2
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
25 reviews
25 reviews
25 reviews
25 reviews
Performance & Hardware
25 reviews
25 reviews
25 reviews
Camera
25 reviews
25 reviews
25 reviews
25 reviews
Connectivity
25 reviews
25 reviews
25 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 20%Less than a day
- 56%One day
- 16%More than one day
- 8%Two days or more
25 reviews
Software
- 0%It comes with a clean operating system
- 96%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 4%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
25 reviews
- 0%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 50%Every six months
- 50%Every two months or less
25 reviews
User reviews
User Reviews
- marcoantoniot.fernandezPOCO F4 5GGlobal · 8GB · 256GB24 days agoEdit commentReportAre you sure?ContinueBest budget gaming phone!
Antutu benchmark score:
Power Saving Mode > (not tested yet)
Balanced Mode > 681,093
Performance Mode > 714,066
[Gaming Test]
Minecraft: (Balanced mode)
- 22 Chunk render distance @ 60 ~ 120 fps
- 12 Chunk render distance @ 90 ~ 120 fps
- Lowest render distance @ 110 ~ 120 fps
Genshin Impact: (Balanced mode)
- Highest Graphics @ 20 ~ 40 fps
- High Graphics @ 30 ~ 50 fps
- Medium Graphics @ 40 ~ 60 fps
- Low Graphics @ 50 ~ 60 fps
- Lowest Graphics @ 55 ~ 61 fps
Azur Lane: (Balanced mode)
- @ 55 ~ 61 fps
[Camera Test]
Main Camera > 4.5/5
Selfie Camera > 4.5/5
[Durability]
Water resistance > 3/5
Projectile/Fall resistance > 3.5/5
[Comfortability]
- 4.5/5
(I'm a Filipino so my overall rating is high because having a good phone like this is a blessing!) (Also, I'm confused how the Poco F4 performs better than it's GT counterpart...)
Edit: My comment and rating here is for the Poco F4 5G 8/256, not the 6/128 version...Pros- Fast Charging
- Gaming Phone
- Most games can now be played with ease
Cons- Quick battery discharge
- May overheat to heavy games
- 9.5
- Screen9.7
- Performance9.6
- Camera9.7
- Connectivity10
- Battery5.0
View answers - Awesome upgrade
Previously using Poco X3 NFC and that phone was good especially the battery life. F4 is another mile. I can play Mobile Legends in Ultra FR/Graphics smoothly on 120Hz although there's a bit of sacrifice on the battery life. Phone is very responsive, the speakers are loud, the haptics is satisfying. Dolby vision and atmos are a treat especially when watching supported content and the display is excellent and can read well under sunlight (1300 nits on Auto). The phone is fast on Wifi and 5G. The camera is good although there's a lot to be desired in nighttime photos (I use Gcam as a sub). Overall, a veri nice phone.
Pros- Display + Dolby vision
- Sound + Dolby atmos
- Performance
- Daytime camera
Cons- Night photos
- Battery life
- 8.9
- Screen8.5
- Performance9.6
- Camera8.5
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - Good phone that would last long
Incredible amoled display, good performance, fast battery charging, i got 719k points in antutu benchmark
Pros- Optical stabilization
- 4K videos in 60 fps
- Good selfie camera
- Powerful, and cold at the same time
- Frame feels like metal, but actually plastic
- Lightweight, compared to other phones
Cons- Not as good photos at night, as i though it would be
- In a lot of stores this phone is out of stock
- 9.4
- Screen10
- Performance9.6
- Camera8.7
- Connectivity9.5
- Battery7.0
View answers - Mobile performance in games is very strong and very smooth I love this mobile
The design is not the most beautiful thing but easy to catch and the battery lasts less than a day and the camera is beautiful that's all I have
- 9.8
- Screen9.2
- Performance10
- Camera9.0
- Connectivity10
- Battery5.0
View answers - 9.1
- Screen9.5
- Performance10
- Camera8.2
- Connectivity9.6
- Battery7.0
View answers- AutoGreat cell phone for that price
It is a cell phone that has many high-end features. Being Little, it is focused on performance and not on multimedia like the Xiaomi Mi, but it is compliant in these aspects. It gets a little hot with demanding games when put on Ultra. I did not get a bug in the proximity sensor. The battery life is its weak point due to its capacity, although it has a fast charge of 67 wtts that is not highly recommended to use often.
Pros- The screen
- the processor
- Updated to Miui 14
- the rear camera
- Sound
- Fluency
Cons- Battery
- Warm up on demanding graphics
- Frontal camera
View original review- 9.2
- Screen8.0
- Performance8.0
- Camera6.7
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - 9.5
- Screen9.0
- Performance9.3
- Camera9.5
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery10
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 1 day ago
- Operating System 1 month ago
- On Sale 8 months ago
- Version 9 months ago
- Name, RAM, Storage 9 months ago
- Aliases, Market, Features 9 months ago
- Sensor Model, Sensor Model, Sensor Model, Photos 9 months ago
- Camera, Selfie Camera, Battery Composition 9 months ago
- Release date 9 months ago
- Camera, Sensor Type, Photos 9 months ago
Score
- 8.1 Design & Materials
- 7.9 Performance & Hardware
- 7.5 Camera
- 8.4 Connectivity
- 6.2 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.