you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
POCO M7 reviews by real users POCO M7 4G
- 6.9"LCD IPSFHD+20:9
- 224 g82.0 mm171.1 mm8.6 mm
- SnapD. 685 Octa-Core 6 GB RAM 128 GB
- 475.000 v10
- 7000 mAh 33 W ~ 62h
- 1 50 Mpx ƒ/1.8 2 0.8 Mpx Unknow SELF 8 Mpx · ƒ/2.0
- Android 15 HyperOS 2.X (Android 15)
User reviews
User score
- 3
- 4
- 2
- 0
- 0
- Screen7.6
- Performance6.8
- Camera4.9
- Connectivity8.1
- Battery8.7
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
9 reviews
9 reviews
9 reviews
9 reviews
Performance & Hardware
9 reviews
9 reviews
9 reviews
Camera
9 reviews
9 reviews
9 reviews
9 reviews
Connectivity
9 reviews
9 reviews
9 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 11%Less than a day
- 11%One day
- 44%More than one day
- 33%Two days or more
9 reviews
Software
- 0%It comes with a clean operating system
- 89%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 11%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
9 reviews
- 0%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 50%Every six months
- 50%Every two months or less
9 reviews
- 6.8
- Screen6.5
- Performance6.0
- Camera5.5
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery10
View answers- AutoPretty good for the price you pay
They have good specs considering the price. For everyday use, the battery can easily last more than a day and still have some left. Their weakest point is the cameras, which can be somewhat blurry indoors in good lighting. The processing power can handle several current games at high settings, or medium settings if you're looking for a high frame rate. The operating system isn't great; it sometimes struggles to keep two applications open in multitasking, and I haven't found a way to enable split-screen or floating windows.
Pros- Battery
- Price
- Power
- Design
Cons- Cameras
- Operating system
View original review- 5.9
- Screen7.2
- Performance4.6
- Camera4.0
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoIt has some good qualities but also some major flaws
It has a large 6.9-inch screen and a massive 7000 mAh battery, but charging is only 33W; it should have at least 66W given the battery size. But the biggest drawback is the processor, which is far too slow even in basic applications, with noticeable display lag, etc. I prefer the standard 5G version (not the Pro 5G) which offers a slightly more powerful processor, but the problem is that it's not available everywhere. The camera is too basic; there's no 4K.
Pros- Screen
- Autonomy
- Price
Cons- Processor power
- No 5G
- Photo quality
- Charging power
View original review- 4.8
- Screen8.0
- Performance5.0
- Camera5.0
- Connectivity5.3
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoDon't let the battery fool you
The battery lasts me 12 hours with power saving mode, and I'm someone who uses it all day, so you know. It's not that fast, but you can use it for the basics. However, it does get slow sometimes with even the smallest tasks, so I'd say look for a better option before buying that one. If you're not a demanding user, maybe it's okay, but the camera is really bad. When you zoom in, the photos are blurry, and the selfies are too. I tried it with a not-so-demanding game, and it ran really slowly, but that could be due to the game's optimization. Anyway, think it over carefully; maybe it's just my phone that's like that.
Pros- Battery
Cons- Cameras
- Performance
View original review- 8
- Screen7.0
- Performance6.0
- Camera0.0
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery5.0
View answers - 8.5
- Screen7.5
- Performance9.0
- Camera5.0
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery9.0
View answers- AutoThere is nothing less for less than €150
The battery lasts two full days without any issues. I'm coming from a Redmi Note 11, which didn't last a full day. The first day feels like a long time, but by the second, you've gotten used to it. The worst part about the phone is the main camera; that's where they've cut corners. Apps run smoothly and without lag, although I've seen faster ones (the memory speed is 2.2, and there are some that are 4.0, although not in this price range). When I show it to people, they can't believe it's a phone for less than €150.
View original review- 7.4
- Screen8.2
- Performance6.6
- Camera6.0
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery10
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 1 month ago
- Usable surface 2 months ago
- Features 2 months ago
- Width, Height, Thickness 2 months ago
- On Sale 10 months ago
- Version 10 months ago
- Name, Storage 10 months ago
- SAR, SAR 10 months ago
- Battery Composition 10 months ago
- Weight, Processor 10 months ago
Score
- 6.2 Design & Materials
- 6.8 Performance & Hardware
- 5.5 Camera
- 6.2 Connectivity
- 8.3 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
