you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
POCO X5 Pro 5G reviews by real users POCO X5 Pro 5G
- "Ki" Value for Money Score8
- Pros
- Battery
- Design
- Screen refresh rate
Cons- No Telephoto lens
- Camera stabilization
- 6.67"AMOLEDFHD+20:9
- 181 g76.0 mm162.9 mm7.9 mm
- SnapD. 778 Octa-Core 6 GB RAM 128 GB
- 691.000 v11
- 5000 mAh 67 W
- 1 108 Mpx ƒ/1.9 2 8 Mpx ƒ/2.2 3 2 Mpx ƒ/2.4 SELF 16 Mpx · ƒ/2.4
- Android 14 Upside-down cake HyperOS (Android 14)
User reviews
User score
- 90
- 13
- 0
- 1
- 1
- Screen8.7
- Performance9.0
- Camera7.9
- Connectivity9.2
- Battery8.2
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Let me sum it up for you
Kimovil users consider this smartphone an excellent value-for-money option. They highlight its good performance for daily use and gaming, although some point out limitations in very demanding tasks or over time. There are diverse opinions regarding the operating system and overheating.
Design & Materials
According to our users, the 120Hz AMOLED display is very good and fluid. However, brightness under direct sunlight is a recurring point for improvement.
105 reviews
105 reviews
105 reviews
105 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, performance is fluid for everyday use and most games. Although the processor is powerful, it can heat up and show lags in very demanding games.
105 reviews
105 reviews
105 reviews
Camera
According to our users, the main camera is decent for daytime photos and records well in 4K. However, the selfie camera, night photos, and macro shots receive criticism for their quality.
105 reviews
105 reviews
105 reviews
105 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, connectivity is generally good, including 5G and NFC. However, some experience coverage issues or sound quality problems during calls.
105 reviews
105 reviews
105 reviews
Battery
According to our users, the battery offers good autonomy for a day of use, and the 67W fast charging is highly valued. Some report degradation and overheating with intense use.
- 0%Less than half day
- 7%Less than a day
- 32%One day
- 50%More than one day
- 11%Two days or more
105 reviews
Software
- 3%It comes with a clean operating system
- 80%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 17%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
105 reviews
- 5%Never
- 3%Once a year
- 61%Every six months
- 31%Every two months or less
105 reviews
- Very bad connection, the sound quality is also bad.
The phone generally outperforms others in a similar price range. It has great specs, doesn’t lag, and the battery works great—even after two years, I haven’t noticed a significant decline in battery life. It captures focus well in night photos, and the overall photo quality is decent. After two years of using the phone with a case, the body still looks like it just came out of the factory.
As for complaints, I’d improve the sound quality and volume because it’s really weak. Sometimes I lose connection in the middle of the city, while my brother, in the same spot and on the same network, gets 5G. If it were up to me, I’d rather pay an extra $50 to get this phone with better sound and connectivity.Pros- Performance
- Fast Charging
- Good Cooling
- Long battery life
Cons- Connection
- Sound Volume
- 7.9
- Screen9.7
- Performance6.0
- Camera8.0
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - Best midrange for a fair price
The performance is great for a cheap price as a midrange phone. The battery is quite long lasting too despite the 120hz fps. The camera is 50/50 but i dont bother bcs im not a camera guy, more into performance. But this phone will be a little bit lagging on a high demanding game such as pubg (if there is too much people) and genshin impact. But for Mobile Legend everything is great can play high grafic with 120hz gameplay. If you ask me, i still say it worth it since the price is affordable but the specs is top of midrange. If you a heavy gamer, just buy flagship dont buy midrange.
Pros- Performance
- Battery
- Screen
Cons- No card slot
- Camera
- 8.9
- Screen8.5
- Performance7.3
- Camera6.7
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 20 days ago
- AnTuTu 3 months ago
- AnTuTu Version 3 months ago
- Version 2 years ago
- Pros & Cons 3 years ago
- Features 3 years ago
- On Sale 3 years ago
- Name, RAM, Storage 3 years ago
- Aliases, SAR, SAR, Market 3 years ago
- Flash, Sensor Model, Sensor Model, Selfie Camera 3 years ago
Score
- 7.4 Design & Materials
- 6.9 Performance & Hardware
- 7.1 Camera
- 7.8 Connectivity
- 6.4 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
