you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
POCO X7 reviews by real users POCO X7
- "Ki" Value for Money Score8.5
- EfficiencyCGAA B C D EA B C D E
- Pros
- Battery
- Coverage
- NFC
Cons- No wireless charging
- No Telephoto lens
- Night photos
- 6.67"AMOLEDQHD20:9
- 185 g74.4 mm162.3 mm8.4 mm
- Dimensity 7300 Octa-Core 8 GB RAM 256 GB
- 887.398 v11
- 5110 mAh 45 W ~ 41h
- 1 50 Mpx ƒ/1.5 2 8 Mpx ƒ/2.2 3 2 Mpx ƒ/2.4 SELF 20 Mpx · ƒ/2.2
- Android 16 HyperOS 3.X (Android 16)
User reviews
User score
- 39
- 7
- 0
- 0
- 0
- Screen8.7
- Performance9.1
- Camera8.0
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery7.0
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Let me sum it up for you
Kimovil users believe this smartphone is a very balanced device with excellent value for money. They highlight its design, screen, and overall performance for daily use and gaming. However, there are divided opinions on software optimization, battery life, and camera performance in certain conditions.
Design & Materials
According to our users, the AMOLED screen is excellent for its sharpness, brightness, and fluidity, although its curvature causes accidental touches for some.
46 reviews
46 reviews
46 reviews
46 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, performance is fluid for daily use and gaming, although some experience occasional lags, overheating, and software optimization issues.
46 reviews
46 reviews
46 reviews
Camera
According to our users, the cameras are decent for the price and casual use, performing well in daylight but struggling in low light and with selfies.
46 reviews
46 reviews
46 reviews
46 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, connectivity is very good, highlighting 5G, NFC, and IP68, although some report occasional Wi-Fi disconnections.
46 reviews
46 reviews
46 reviews
Battery
According to our users, the battery offers good autonomy for daily use, although some consider it insufficient for intense gaming sessions.
- 2%Less than half day
- 22%Less than a day
- 50%One day
- 24%More than one day
- 2%Two days or more
46 reviews
Software
- 2%It comes with a clean operating system
- 83%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 15%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
46 reviews
- 0%Never
- 3%Once a year
- 53%Every six months
- 45%Every two months or less
46 reviews
- plis panas kalo siang
about the curved screen,it doesn't matter, please i want OS downgrade
Pros- ultrawide
- smooth video without stabilizer tool
- 60 fps gaming
- daily friendly
Cons- halfday battery
- magazine wallpaper bug
- lagging after OS update
- camera lagging when open it instead
- 9.2
- Screen9.5
- Performance9.6
- Camera9.5
- Connectivity10
- Battery5.0
View answers - A very good smartphone
A very good smartphone, with a yellow and black design, very cool and beautiful. It runs heavy games and applications, such as PS2 emulator and others. In the first days, the battery was very weak, but after five days it learned how I use it and literally transformed. During the day, the camera is beautiful, at night it is a little lacking, but it is still decent. Fast charging, quad HD screen with lots of brightness and details, perfect for watching and playing.
Pros- Performance
- Battery
- Charging
- Lightweight system
- Waterproof
- Unique leather design
Cons- Night camera
- Ads
- 9.5
- Screen8.7
- Performance9.6
- Camera6.5
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoThe true value for money
For the price you can get it for here in Colombia, it's a steal—900,000 pesos! And for what it offers, it's IMPOSSIBLE to find a new phone at that price. The HyperOS 3 update, in my case, is fantastic in terms of both performance and battery life, and that's even though I don't charge it to 100% and I don't play with Game Turbo's performance mode active. The camera is quite good, especially the recording. The design is a matter of personal taste; I find it very comfortable to hold, and the screen is excellent—you really notice the difference between a 1.5kHz FHD+ screen.
Pros- Screen
- Performance
- Battery
- Video recording
- Temperature
Cons- Headphone jack
- Low brightness
- pre-installed apps
- 45w charging
View original review- 9.5
- Screen9.2
- Performance9.3
- Camera8.2
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - 8.6
- Screen8.0
- Performance8.0
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity7.6
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 26 days ago
- AnTuTu Version 7 months ago
- AnTuTu 7 months ago
- Aliases 9 months ago
- Version 1 year ago
- Name, Storage 1 year ago
- Weight, Capacity (mAh), Market, Features 1 year ago
- Pros & Cons 1 year ago
- On Sale 1 year ago
- Photos 1 year ago
Score
- 8.6 Design & Materials
- 7.4 Performance & Hardware
- 7.3 Camera
- 7.8 Connectivity
- 7.1 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
