User reviews

User score

6.0
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 0
  • 1
7 reviews
  • Screen6.1
  • Performance6.3
  • Camera6.4
  • Connectivity7.8
  • Battery7.6
Do you want to share your opinion?

It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.

Design & Materials

Is it a drop-resistant and scratch-resistant smartphone?
7.2

7 reviews

Do you think it's a nice phone?
5.1

7 reviews

Is it comfortable?
6.7

7 reviews

Can you see it well in the sunlight?
5.7

7 reviews

Performance & Hardware

Does it have good sound?
6.3

7 reviews

Does it work smoothly in everyday use?
6.7

7 reviews

What's your experience been with demanding games?
6.0

7 reviews

Camera

Quality of daytime photos
7.4

7 reviews

Quality of nighttime photos
5.1

7 reviews

Quality of selfies
5.6

7 reviews

Does it have a powerful flash?
7.3

7 reviews

Connectivity

Does it have good coverage for calls?
7.9

7 reviews

Quality of the GPS
7.3

7 reviews

And the WiFi?
8.1

7 reviews

Battery

How long does the battery last?
  • 14%
    Less than half day
  • 14%
    Less than a day
  • 0%
    One day
  • 29%
    More than one day
  • 43%
    Two days or more

7 reviews

Software

Did it come with preinstalled applications?
  • 14%
    It comes with a clean operating system
  • 71%
    It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
  • 14%
    It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall

7 reviews

Do you regularly receive updates?
  • 14%
    Never
  • 14%
    Once a year
  • 14%
    Every six months
  • 57%
    Every two months or less

7 reviews

View more

All 7 opinions

  • Below Average

    Pros
    • Excellent Battery life
    Cons
    • Camera
    • display
    • flash
    • emmc 5.1
    • ram
    • performance
    • 6
    • Screen7.2
    • Performance5.3
    • Camera4.7
    • Connectivity6.6
    • Battery9.0
  • Auto
    Good, but over time it starts to sag a little

    • 6.8
    • Screen5.5
    • Performance6.6
    • Camera7.2
    • Connectivity8.0
    • Battery0.0
  • Auto
    Holds a charge for a long time and is cheap

    Well, it's ok for about 3-5 thousand rubles, it costs on used markets. In Antutu, after all the updates, it really gets 270k+. Photos in good light are not bad for its price. You can play Call of Duty 50-60 fps low settings, tanks 60 fps on medium. Standoff 2 60 fps on medium.

    Pros
    • Good battery, price, still being updated
    Cons
    • Price in the store 16k, video
    • 7
    • Screen4.5
    • Performance5.6
    • Camera5.0
    • Connectivity7.0
    • Battery10
  • Auto
    Shit

    I used it for a year and a half, I didn't live, I survived. Firstly: 64 GB is very little, it's not suitable for games at all. After buying GT Neo2, he realized that no one else needed it and decided to make a screen failure, but I'm not going to change the screen on it, now it lies on the shelf all in dust with a non-working screen

    • 1.9
    • Screen4.5
    • Performance2.0
    • Camera5.5
    • Connectivity5.3
    • Battery5.0
  • Auto
    good for its time

    Pros
    • Battery and autonomy
    • Update frequency
    • Doesn't troll (for me)
    • Main camera module
    • Charging speed (18W does not charge for a long time)
    Cons
    • Screen
    • Heating in games
    • Autonomy in games (any, not even demanding
    • Front-camera
    • 7.2
    • Screen6.5
    • Performance7.6
    • Camera6.7
    • Connectivity8.3
    • Battery10
  • Auto
    A good phone, the price is above average and there is something for it

    the best model of all the others that I have, were samsungs used to be good, they have now deteriorated. He was recommended to me by acquaintance and I didn’t see all the advantages right away, the Samsungs beloved by everyone are more expensive and worse. It will not work for many, many people are empty, they need other low-quality phones. This phone is for normal people

    Cons
    • The firmware has minor flaws, but very minor
    • 9
    • Screen8.3
    • Performance8.3
    • Camera9.0
    • Connectivity9.0
    • Battery10
  • Auto
    Budget smartphone

    Took for 17000, 4/128, did not pay attention to the display and camera. When used as a dialer, or suitable for games, everything pulls the game, the sound is average, not stereo, the battery is excellent for a day. The camera is of medium quality when recording video, pixels are visible, in the photo, fuzzy pixels are visible. Low resolution display 1600-700, frequency 60 Hz. Good processor does not slow down.

    • 4.4
    • Screen7.0
    • Performance8.6
    • Camera6.2
    • Connectivity10
    • Battery9.0

This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.

Last update
January 3, 2026
State
  • Rumor
  • Presell
  • New
  • On Sale
Latest changes
  • New opinion 7 months ago
  • AnTuTu 2 years ago
  • Version 4 years ago
  • Features 4 years ago
?
Ki Cost-effective
Score
Not available
What is a Ki score?
Ki is an automatic score based on the specifications and prices of devices. It is calculated using over 200 variables to rank smartphones, tablets and other devices from best to worst.
How do we calculate the Ki?

In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:

  • Design and screen
  • Hardware and performance
  • Camera
  • Connectivity
  • Battery

Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.

Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.

Does the Ki score change?

The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.