you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho reviews by real users Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho
- 6.5"LCD IPSHD+20:9
- 205 g75.8 mm164.0 mm8.9 mm
- Exynos 850 Octa-Core 4 GB RAM 32 GB
- 117.300 v8
- 5000 mAh 15 W
- 1 48 Mpx ƒ/2.0 2 5 Mpx ƒ/2.0 3 2 Mpx ƒ/2.4 4 2 Mpx ƒ/2.4 SELF 8 Mpx · ƒ/2.2
- Android 12 Snow Cone Android 12
User reviews
User score
- 3
- 6
- 10
- 1
- 0
- Screen6.1
- Performance5.2
- Camera5.9
- Connectivity6.8
- Battery7.8
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
20 reviews
20 reviews
20 reviews
20 reviews
Performance & Hardware
20 reviews
20 reviews
20 reviews
Camera
20 reviews
20 reviews
20 reviews
20 reviews
Connectivity
20 reviews
20 reviews
20 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 10%Less than a day
- 45%One day
- 40%More than one day
- 5%Two days or more
20 reviews
Software
- 15%It comes with a clean operating system
- 70%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 15%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
20 reviews
- 17%Never
- 11%Once a year
- 39%Every six months
- 33%Every two months or less
20 reviews
- Auto"Balanced for undemanding users"
For gaming, it's not its strong point; the camera takes decent and acceptable photos. The battery lasts a while, but it takes a bit of time to charge. From my experience: It works perfectly, I haven't had any lag, it's quite stable, although the only issue is that every now and then the screen seems to glitch (it turns on, but the screen doesn't light up). You have to keep trying until it finally turns on... Other than that, it works well.
Pros- Stability
- It manages heat better than it seems
- Acceptable camera
- Resistant to certain types of impacts
Cons- Gaming performance
- Too expensive for what it offers
View original review- 6
- Screen5.0
- Performance4.6
- Camera5.0
- Connectivity5.6
- Battery7.0
View answers - anonymous_491651_69e5b653052de
Samsung Galaxy A12 NachoAmerica · 4GB · 128GB · SM-A127M/DS6 months agoAutoGood cell phone for the price a few years agoCurrently it's only good for the basics, it's stuck on Android 12, it freezes when navigating the system, its screen is poor quality and 60Hz, its battery is very good and lasts a long time, its camera is adequate, it's made of plastic, it charges slowly, its performance is poor in demanding games.
Pros- Battery
- Camera
- Endurance
- Price
Cons- Performance
- Screen
- Construction materials
- Slow charging
- Android 12
View original review- 4.4
- Screen5.0
- Performance3.0
- Camera5.5
- Connectivity5.0
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoGood
The good thing is its battery since it lasts quite a while and not to mention if it is not used much and it is in ultra saving mode since it has lasted me up to 3 weeks, it is resistant, I have dropped it in the ground and everything but it hasn't had anything to do with it, just like in the water, it has fallen on me a few times but nothing has happened to it.
Pros- The battery
- Resistant
Cons- Heats up in games
View original review- 5
- Screen8.0
- Performance5.6
- Camera6.3
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoIt's a cell phone that actually works for using WhatsApp, calls, and stuff like that.
It's really not worth it. If you were thinking about buying this phone, it's not worth it, since saving a little more will help you find better ones at the same price. It's not worth it at all.
Pros- Daily use
- Battery
- Price
Cons- Bad photos
- Poor memory
- Low power
- Bad screen
- Updates
View original review- 4.7
- Screen5.2
- Performance4.0
- Camera2.0
- Connectivity5.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - Autogarbage itself
I do not recommend it, it is very slow and does not receive updates today, for games with luck it goes at 30 fps in a not so demanding game another thing is that it gets too hot in games, it takes a long time to open apps and it crashes due to its horrible processor
Pros- the battery
- endurance
Cons- the processor
- the camera
- the fluency
- overheating in games
- screen
- bad sound
View original review- 4.6
- Screen6.0
- Performance2.0
- Camera5.0
- Connectivity5.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - 4.4
- Screen4.2
- Performance4.0
- Camera5.0
- Connectivity4.3
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 25 days ago
- Camera 1 year ago
- Features 2 years ago
- Aliases 2 years ago
- Operating System 4 years ago
- Version 4 years ago
- Name, Storage 4 years ago
- Version 4 years ago
- Market 4 years ago
Score
no Ki
- 5.1 Design & Materials
- 5.3 Performance & Hardware
- 5.8 Camera
- 5.8 Connectivity
- 6.7 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
