you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Opinions from the Samsung Galaxy A12 Nacho
- 6.5"LCD IPSHD+20:9
- 205 g75.8 mm164.0 mm8.9 mm
- Exynos 850 Octa-Core 4 GB RAM 32 GB
- v8 117.300
- 5000 mAh
- 1 48 Mpx · ƒ/2.0 234SELF 8 Mpx · ƒ/2.2
- Android 12 Snow Cone Android 12
User score
- 3
- 4
- 3
- 1
- 0
- Screen6.8
- Performance6.0
- Camera6.4
- Connectivity7.6
- Battery8.2
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
Performance & Hardware
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
Camera
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
Connectivity
11 reviews
11 reviews
11 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 0%Less than a day
- 45%One day
- 45%More than one day
- 9%Two days or more
11 reviews
Software
- 27%It comes with a clean operating system
- 55%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 18%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
11 reviews
- 0%Never
- 20%Once a year
- 50%Every six months
- 30%Every two months or less
11 reviews
User reviews
- AutoI recommend
I've had this phone since 2021, when playing games I have nothing to complain about because most games don't crash on average graphics, for example free fire, most apps don't crash, mine has already fallen to the ground more than 9 times and never cracked the screen Very good battery lasts almost a day The camera is good, I recommend buying it for anyone who wants a basic cell phone to use apps and play basic games.
Pros- Processor
- Camera
- Resistance
View original review- 8.6
- Screen7.2
- Performance9.0
- Camera9.2
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoSo-so budget employee
It's like a phone. I bought it for 14,000 rubles, and even for that money there are a huge number of better phones. For me, the most important thing is the camera and performance, and this smartphone takes very, very average pictures during the day, but at night it’s just terrible, complete soap! Well, okay, this is a budget phone, the camera can be forgiven, but with performance things are even worse. It does not pull absolutely anything that can be called even slightly modern. Yes, not only is it not capable of playing games, you can’t even put animated wallpaper on it - it will die from lags. Sometimes you just turn it on and it suddenly starts to lag and freeze terribly. These are probably its main disadvantages, but there are also advantages. For example, his battery. It is quite capacious, enough for a day or two of moderate use. But other than autonomy, I didn’t find any advantages in it. Even at the time of its release there was no point in buying it - there were smartphones for the same price, but better. In general, if you are looking for a budget car for a child or even more so for yourself, take a closer look at other models. Realme, for example, has a good budget phone for 15k - realme 10 and 10 pro, Xiaomi still has smartphones with good performance for little money, there is the infinix hot 30 or infinix note 30i, and in the end there are excellent budget options from Tecno - tecno pova 4, spark 10 pro and other models. There is no point in buying this smartphone now.
Pros- Capacious battery
Cons- Increase resolution when shooting video with the main module
- Increase the resolution of the ultra-wide-angle module
- Processor power
- Reduce heat and throttling in games
View original review- 2.4
- Screen3.2
- Performance2.0
- Camera4.2
- Connectivity5.3
- Battery9.0
View answers - Autogood 6.0
The bad thing is = 1. The night camera 2. full sun screen 3. Lack of 120Hz refresh rate 4. exynos 850 2.0 ghz is not enough for Geometry dash 2.11 / Fortnite and Genshin impack games because there are obstacles / Lagasos. 5. 4gb ram memory 6. Fast charging Nothing else is everything
Pros- All
- Camera
- Least heavy and super heavy games
- Ips screen less quality
- Battery 5000 the size
- Sound with equalizer
Cons- take photos at night
- full sun screen
- Missing Soda cup 120 HZ
- 2.0Ghz is not enough to play geometry das 2.11
- Ram memory 4Gb
- Fast charge
View original review- 5
- Screen7.5
- Performance6.6
- Camera5.2
- Connectivity7.6
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- Features 1 day ago
- New opinion 1 month ago
- Aliases 1 month ago
- Operating System 1 year ago
- Version 1 year ago
- Name, Storage 2 years ago
- Version 2 years ago
- Market 2 years ago
Score
no Ki
- 4.8 Design & Materials
- 5.3 Performance & Hardware
- 5.6 Camera
- 5.9 Connectivity
- 7.6 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.