you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G reviews by real users Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
- "Ki" Value for Money Score7.6
- Pros
- Stereo Speakers
- Display quality
Cons- Wifi Connectivity
- Price
- Slow SOC
- Overheating
- 6.5"Super AMOLEDFHD+19.5:9
- 197 g76.5 mm161.0 mm8.3 mm
- Exynos 1280 Octa-Core 6 GB RAM 128 GB
- 480.688 v10
- 5000 mAh 25 W
- 1 50 Mpx ƒ/1.8 2 5 Mpx ƒ/2.2 3 2 Mpx ƒ/2.4 SELF 13 Mpx · ƒ/2.2
- Android 16 Android 16
User reviews
User score
- 19
- 18
- 5
- 1
- 0
- Screen8.1
- Performance7.3
- Camera7.7
- Connectivity8.1
- Battery6.5
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Let me sum it up for you
Kimovil users consider it a mid-range phone offering good value for money for basic use. They praise its design and screen, but there's a general consensus regarding performance and overheating issues, suggesting it's ideal for non-demanding users.
Design & Materials
According to our users, the 120Hz AMOLED screen offers good brightness and quality, although some criticize the notch and large bezels.
43 reviews
43 reviews
43 reviews
43 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, performance is acceptable for basic tasks, but the Exynos processor suffers from overheating and lag with games or multitasking.
43 reviews
43 reviews
43 reviews
Camera
According to our users, the main camera is decent during the day and records 4K, but night photos and the selfie camera are weak points.
43 reviews
43 reviews
43 reviews
43 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, Wi-Fi connectivity is a weak point, with fluctuating signal and lag issues in online games.
43 reviews
43 reviews
43 reviews
Battery
According to our users, the 5000 mAh battery is sufficient for a day of moderate use, but drains quickly with 120Hz or intense use.
- 5%Less than half day
- 33%Less than a day
- 37%One day
- 26%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
43 reviews
Software
- 10%It comes with a clean operating system
- 83%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 7%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
43 reviews
- 0%Never
- 10%Once a year
- 45%Every six months
- 45%Every two months or less
43 reviews
- 10/10 me re sirve para todo clase de uso, juegos, tareas, trabajo, etc
lo único malo creo que sería el wifi en juegos, nose si será error de ni dispositivo pero no agarra bien la señal del wifi y da lag, pero de ahí en más, todo perfecto
Pros- 10/10
Cons- señal de wifi
- 10
- Screen10
- Performance10
- Camera9.2
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers - Good price-to-performance ratio.
It's been 3 months since I got this phone. I payed 1100 lei, which is about 240 US Dollars.
I really like the design of the phone, with the rounded corners of the body. It kinda looks like the Samsung Galaxy S24. I would have liked Gorilla Glass on the front, not just regular glass. Fingerprint sensor is not very accurate, maybe because my palms are either very dry or very sweaty. The display is quite impressive, it has good brigthness, quite visible in the sunlight, with the help of Samsung's Vision Booster also. It lacks adaptive refresh rate, so you gotta stick with either fixed 60 Hz, which I do, or fixed 120 Hz, which basically ruins battery. For example, if you watch Netflix content, which is mostly displayed in 24-30 fps, it's stupid to have your screen all the time updating 120 times per second. The camera is decent, Optical Image Stabilization is not the best, but it's better than nothing. It can record 60 fps only in Full HD resolution, but it has Slowmotion and Super Slowmotion mode. Again, I would have liked a Telephoto lens instead of the Macro, which I rarely use, but for the price, it is what it is. Let's talk a bit about the performance. It has the same chipset as the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G. It's not the fastest phone on the marketplace, but again, considering the price, it is what it is. You can also game on it, and it's not a terrible experience. The battery lasts one day with normal usage. Impressive sound with the stereo speakers. That's pretty much all I had to say. Overall, I recommend it. Again, kind of a beast for it's price.Pros- Design
- Screen
- Battery
- Camera
- Speakers
- Software
Cons- No adaptive refresh rate
- Fingerprint sensor
- 7.2
- Screen7.6
- Performance7.3
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - Good price/value ratio, worth the price (8/256GB €260.- in Hungary, May/2024)
Great tool for listening to music while traveling
Pros- Long lasting battery
- High Quality sound with JBL T110
- SuperAmoled display with high brightness
- LDNIO A2526C charger good for it
- Good main camera
Cons- No wireless charging
- 10
- Screen9.6
- Performance10
- Camera10
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoIt's a good phone for the price and performs quite well.
The phone meets the demands of daily use, whether for casual or extended use. It can also run demanding games; I won't say it can run them all at 120 fps with ultra graphics, but it can handle demanding games at least on low or medium settings. One negative point I would see is its tendency to overheat, which is very noticeable when using the camera for a long time or playing games for extended periods.
Pros- The camera
- The battery
- The screen
- Processor
- RAM
- Storage
Cons- Overheating
- Visels
- Burden
- Night photos
View original review- 8.3
- Screen8.7
- Performance7.6
- Camera8.2
- Connectivity7.6
- Battery9.0
View answers - 7.8
- Screen7.5
- Performance6.0
- Camera6.7
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery5.0
View answers- 5.8
- Screen6.7
- Performance5.3
- Camera5.2
- Connectivity5.6
- Battery5.0
View answers- AutoGood phone for those who don't have much money
This phone has been my main one for almost a year now, I bought it around December 2024. It's served me incredibly well, I'd give it a 9.4 out of 10, highly recommended, but for the price, I'd save up more to buy at least the regular S22.
Pros- It has lasted
- I do well with moderately demanding games
Cons- Sometimes I get high ping in online games
- It might freeze up, but you just need to restart it.
View original review- 9.4
- Screen8.5
- Performance8.0
- Camera5.7
- Connectivity8.6
- Battery5.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 24 days ago
- Version 1 month ago
- Name, Storage 1 month ago
- Pros & Cons 4 months ago
- Camera 1 year ago
- Sensor Model, Sensor Model, Sensor Model, Selfie Camera 1 year ago
- Features 1 year ago
- AnTuTu Version 2 years ago
- AnTuTu 2 years ago
- Market 2 years ago
Score
- 6.1 Design & Materials
- 6.2 Performance & Hardware
- 6.8 Camera
- 7.6 Connectivity
- 6.8 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
