you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G reviews by real users Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
- "Ki" Value for Money Score7.7
- Pros
- Battery
- Camera quality
- Display quality
- Price
Cons- No FM Radio
- 6.6"Super AMOLEDFHD+20:9
- 199 g78.1 mm161.3 mm8.2 mm
- Dimensity 1080 Octa-Core 6 GB RAM 128 GB
- 532.300 v10
- 5000 mAh 25 W
- 1 48 Mpx ƒ/1.8 2 5 Mpx ƒ/2.2 3 5 Mpx ƒ/2.4 SELF 13 Mpx · ƒ/2.2
- Android 14 Upside-down cake Android 14
User reviews
User score
- 112
- 31
- 2
- 1
- 0
- Screen8.3
- Performance8.4
- Camera7.8
- Connectivity8.8
- Battery7.5
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Let me sum it up for you
Kimovil users believe it is a very balanced mid-range phone with a good quality-price ratio, especially if purchased on offer. They highlight its fluidity and resistance, although there are diverse opinions about its design and construction materials.
Design & Materials
According to our users, the 120Hz Super AMOLED screen is of good quality and fluid. Brightness is low outdoors, and the teardrop notch generates mixed opinions.
146 reviews
146 reviews
146 reviews
146 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, performance is fluid for daily use and not very demanding games. It heats up with heavy games, and the 6GB/128GB version can be slow.
146 reviews
146 reviews
146 reviews
Camera
According to our users, the cameras are good in good light conditions and record in 4K. However, night photos and the front camera receive criticism for their quality and noise.
146 reviews
146 reviews
146 reviews
146 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, 5G and NFC connectivity are strong points. Stereo audio is decent, but the speakers are mediocre. IP67 resistance is valued, although the charging port may fail.
146 reviews
146 reviews
146 reviews
Battery
According to our users, the battery is good and durable for daily use, although some report rapid degradation over time. The 25W fast charging is slow and does not include a charger.
- 1%Less than half day
- 18%Less than a day
- 38%One day
- 39%More than one day
- 4%Two days or more
146 reviews
Software
- 10%It comes with a clean operating system
- 80%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 9%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
146 reviews
- 1%Never
- 7%Once a year
- 44%Every six months
- 49%Every two months or less
146 reviews
- Good for midrange
Its a good midrange for its price and how the Performance is.the only thing annoying me is the light situation and the night photos.its not very usable in the second year but its alright for basic needs and games.Just saying year after year its getting -30% usable so if you want this phone for 2-3 years its a good choice
Pros- Battery
- Performance
- Photos(in Daylight)
- Smooth on heavy games
- Not pricey
Cons- Night photos
- Not enough brightness
- Unusable after 3 years
- Wifi
- Low Ram
- Annoying notch
- 7.9
- Screen7.0
- Performance8.0
- Camera6.5
- Connectivity6.5
- Battery7.0
View answers - Amazing phone, recommended
It is amazing. I have this for 2 years now and it is smooth like the first day. I have had some problems with 5G wifi as it has poor performance when it comes to thick walls (I know it sounds obvious but other phones seem to function completely fine in the same circumstances. I totally recommend it.
Pros- Photo/video quality
- Software
- Build quality
Cons- Wifi signal
- 9
- Screen9.2
- Performance9.3
- Camera8.5
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - The best in the mid-range
Great screen, processor runs everything, doesn't lag, camera takes nice pictures even at night, I was impressed by the sound from the speakers and the size is very comfortable to hold. From something Much better than Xiaomi In this price range
- 10
- Screen10
- Performance10
- Camera10
- Connectivity10
- Battery10
View answers - 4 years android and 5 support plus 11.5 hrs SOT
It's a nice phone for non gamers. For those of us who live in a practical world this phone will do everything you ask of it and keep doing it long without battery phobia. I have become tired of higher end SOCs sucking juice and Chinese solutions with just 2 android updates. Trying custom ROMs just gave battery drain issues. Samsung, although not my fave with One UI, provided a solution to all these issues at a great price and has won my $. First phone I've had with 'face stay awake' since Honor View 29. The very poor FPS and slow face unlock have started to bug me however and the UI can be very laggy at times especially compared to faster SOCs, despite a reasonably high Antutu with the MTk 1080, which is likely due to the high Samsung OneUi overhead. Got rid for Moto Edge 40, which is an awesomely better phone.
Pros- Battery life
- Amoled
- Weight <200gms
- Battery life
- MTK 1080
- Amoled
- 4/5 Android/security
- Price
- Weight <200gms
- MTK 1080
- 4/5 Android/security
- Price
Cons- Low light pix
- Plastic body(but good plastic)
- Tear drop selfie (for those who care)
- Samsung need get up to speed with charging times
- Face/FPS unlock iffy
- 8.1
- Screen8.5
- Performance7.3
- Camera6.7
- Connectivity7.3
- Battery9.0
View answers - Pretty Good Could Be Better
It's a good quality phone within mid price range..Only problem it gets slidely heated during gaming..Though it also cools down faster so it's quite acceptable..
Pros- Good Build
- Long Lasting Battery
- Good Camera
- Good for daily usage
- Good Display
Cons- Quite Heavy
- Have No 3.5mm Jack
- Slow Ota Update
- 9
- Screen7.2
- Performance8.0
- Camera8.7
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery9.0
View answers - Autoeveryday life
It's okay, not bad but not exactly excellent either. The cameras are a bit below average for its budget (maybe I'm getting too greedy). It's a bit big in size, but in return we get good sound, pleasant vibration, good battery life, a fairly bright 120Hz AMOLED screen. The processor isn't exactly powerful, but it's great for everyday tasks and light gaming.
Pros- Screen
- Autonomy
- Sound
- Vibration
Cons- Cameras
- Dimensions
- Body material
View original review- 6.1
- Screen5.7
- Performance7.0
- Camera5.5
- Connectivity7.3
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 1 day ago
- Name, RAM, Storage 2 years ago
- Version 2 years ago
- Version 2 years ago
- Aliases, Market, Features 2 years ago
- Pros & Cons 2 years ago
- Sensor Model, Sensor Model, Sensor Model, Selfie Camera 2 years ago
- Name 3 years ago
- On Sale 3 years ago
Score
- 6.3 Design & Materials
- 6.4 Performance & Hardware
- 7.2 Camera
- 7.7 Connectivity
- 6.4 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
