you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Samsung Galaxy A56 reviews by real users Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
- "Ki" Value for Money Score8.5
- EfficiencyBGAA B C D EA B C D E
- Pros
- Battery
- Coverage
Cons- No Telephoto lens
- Night photos
- 6.7"Super AMOLEDFHD+19.5:9
- 197 g77.5 mm162.2 mm7.4 mm
- Exynos 1580 Octa-Core 8 GB RAM 128 GB
- 1.257.856 v11
- 5000 mAh 45 W ~ 45h
- 1 50 Mpx ƒ/1.8 2 12 Mpx ƒ/2.2 3 5 Mpx ƒ/2.4 SELF 12 Mpx · ƒ/2.2
- Android 16 Android 16
User reviews
User score
- 86
- 13
- 2
- 0
- 0
- Screen8.8
- Performance8.7
- Camera8.4
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery8.0
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Let me sum it up for you
Kimovil users consider this an excellent mid-range phone, highlighting its great value for money and premium design. They see it as a very complete and balanced device for daily use. However, overheating is a recurring concern, especially with intensive use or gaming.
Design & Materials
According to our users, the screen is excellent, with vibrant colors and fluidity (120Hz). Some users note a lack of brightness under direct sunlight.
101 reviews
101 reviews
101 reviews
101 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, performance is fluid for daily use. Although it's capable with games, overheating is a constant complaint.
101 reviews
101 reviews
101 reviews
Camera
According to our users, the daytime and selfie cameras are very good. Night photos and the absence of a telephoto lens are its main weaknesses.
101 reviews
101 reviews
101 reviews
101 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, connectivity (5G, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth) is very good and reliable. Stereo sound also receives positive feedback.
101 reviews
101 reviews
101 reviews
Battery
According to our users, the battery is fantastic, offering great autonomy for a full day. Charging, however, is perceived as slow.
- 0%Less than half day
- 8%Less than a day
- 38%One day
- 49%More than one day
- 5%Two days or more
101 reviews
Software
- 12%It comes with a clean operating system
- 78%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 10%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
101 reviews
- 0%Never
- 7%Once a year
- 38%Every six months
- 55%Every two months or less
101 reviews
- Solid smartphone, but not exciting...
Samsung has made the A56 both thinner and lighter, which is definitely welcome. Compared to other mid-range phones, the high-quality materials also stand out.
The display is, as usual for Samsung, excellent—vibrant and bright. The device uses the Exynos 1580 processor, which surprised me. There were already improvements with the A55, but the A56 is the first A-series device from Samsung that truly feels smooth most of the time.
ONE UI 8 may also play a role in this good performance. I really like it both visually and functionally; no Android skin appeals to me as much as Samsung’s, even though Stock Android certainly has its advantages. Six years of software updates are very respectable and not something every competitor offers, especially at this price point.
Now we come to an area where Samsung has been lagging behind for years, and where I was partly shocked by the results: the camera. The main camera usually takes decent photos in daylight, but there are situations where it completely fails. Landscape photos sometimes look overly sharpened or suffer from limited dynamic range. Samsung also still has its contrast issue, where colors are boosted in a way that does not reflect reality. The other two cameras can essentially be ignored; even in daylight they are often barely usable. Video recording, on the other hand, is very good, and Samsung is clearly moving in a positive direction here. Selfies are better than on the predecessor, but still not outstanding.
Battery life is good, but I did not notice any improvement over the previous model. With 5G, I get around 6.5 hours of screen-on time, and with Wi-Fi usually around 7 to 7.5 hours.
In summary, Samsung is moving forward very conservatively. It is not a bad device, but the competition is in some areas clearly better—especially when it comes to camera performance.Pros- Nice Build for a Midranger
- Beautiful Display
- Good Performance
- One UI 8 is a nice experience
- Good Battery Life
- Video Quality is good, Selfiecam is decent
Cons- Started at 479€, which is expensive af
- Bad Camera overall
- 45W Charging isnt really faster
- 7.8
- Screen8.2
- Performance7.6
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity8.3
- Battery9.0
View answers - It's a good phone for the price, but the performance is decent not that fast
Overall i use this phone for like 2 month, its a good phone for people who just use it for daily like social media, chatting. And for gaming test sometimes it's really hot on back (maybe around 40-42 degrees celcius). For the camera it's good even tho theres no option for 4k 60 fps recording on front camera :(, i like the experience using this phone, thanks for the one ui ^_^
- 8.1
- Screen8.5
- Performance6.6
- Camera6.7
- Connectivity6.3
- Battery5.0
View answers - Its a very very good phone best midrange in 2025 its has good camera solid performance best phone what i had sould buy it
Best midrange of 2025
9/10 performance
8/10 camera
10/10 battery
10/10 displayPros- Camera
- Performance
- Camera
- Performance
- Display
- Display
- Charging
- Charging
- Selfie camera
- Flash
- Selfie camera
- Flash
Cons- 10x zoom
- Digital zoom
- 10x zoom
- Digital zoom
- 10
- Screen10
- Performance10
- Camera10
- Connectivity10
- Battery10
View answers - AutoOne of the best mid-range phones in the middle of 2026
I've been using it for a week now, and what I can say is that so far it performs exceptionally well for gaming, with stable FPS, good cameras, and good performance for everyday use. The phone itself is one of the best mid-range phones currently available. It's very complete and delivers for the price. But we'll have to wait at least six months to see if it continues to perform the same way.
Pros- Power
- Camera
- Screen
- 45w charge
Cons- It gets too hot.
- Night vision camera
View original review- 9
- Screen8.0
- Performance9.0
- Camera7.7
- Connectivity7.3
- Battery5.0
View answers - 9.1
- Screen9.0
- Performance8.0
- Camera8.0
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 24 days ago
- Features 5 months ago
- Sensor Model 5 months ago
- Camera 5 months ago
- Camera, Camera 5 months ago
- AnTuTu Version 6 months ago
- AnTuTu 6 months ago
- Version 10 months ago
- Name, RAM 10 months ago
- Storage 1 year ago
Score
- 6.9 Design & Materials
- 7.4 Performance & Hardware
- 7.8 Camera
- 8.0 Connectivity
- 6.6 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
