User reviews

User score

9.0
  • 27
  • 4
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
33 reviews
  • Screen9.0
  • Performance8.9
  • Camera8.7
  • Connectivity9.1
  • Battery8.5
Do you want to share your opinion?

It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.

Let me sum it up for you

Kimovil users consider it an excellent mid-premium range device, praising its good value for money, especially when acquired at a competitive price. There's general agreement on its thin, light, and premium design, as well as its update policy. However, some users expected more innovation.

Design & Materials

According to our users, the 120Hz Super AMOLED Plus screen is spectacular, vibrant, and high-quality, with thin bezels.

Is it a drop-resistant and scratch-resistant smartphone?
8.5

33 reviews

Do you think it's a nice phone?
9.3

33 reviews

Is it comfortable?
9.1

33 reviews

Can you see it well in the sunlight?
9.0

33 reviews

Performance & Hardware

According to our users, performance is fluid for daily use. Opinions on the processor are varied, with some noting occasional heating or sluggishness.

Does it have good sound?
9.1

33 reviews

Does it work smoothly in everyday use?
9.2

33 reviews

What's your experience been with demanding games?
8.2

33 reviews

Camera

According to our users, the main camera is competent and improved, delivering good daytime results. The ultra-wide-angle camera is disappointing, and the lack of a telephoto lens is criticized.

Quality of daytime photos
8.9

33 reviews

Quality of nighttime photos
8.3

33 reviews

Quality of selfies
8.8

33 reviews

Does it have a powerful flash?
8.7

33 reviews

Connectivity

According to our users, the absence of a 3.5mm jack and wireless charging are drawbacks. One user also reports unusual signal reception.

Does it have good coverage for calls?
9.0

33 reviews

Quality of the GPS
9.1

33 reviews

And the WiFi?
9.3

33 reviews

Battery

According to our users, the battery provides very good autonomy, lasting more than a day. The included 15W charger is a common complaint.

How long does the battery last?
  • 3%
    Less than half day
  • 0%
    Less than a day
  • 19%
    One day
  • 59%
    More than one day
  • 19%
    Two days or more

33 reviews

Software

Did it come with preinstalled applications?
  • 9%
    It comes with a clean operating system
  • 88%
    It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
  • 3%
    It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall

33 reviews

Do you regularly receive updates?
  • 0%
    Never
  • 0%
    Once a year
  • 13%
    Every six months
  • 87%
    Every two months or less

33 reviews

View more

All 33 opinions

  • Very good

    Pros
    • Display
    • Camera
    • Baterry
    Cons
    • None
    • 10
    • Screen10
    • Performance10
    • Camera10
    • Connectivity10
    • Battery9.0
  • Small improvements over the previous model, but nothing revolutionary.

    The phone is thinner and lighter now, which I really like. But because it's still quite wide, it doesn't feel that comfortable to hold with one hand. The processor is only a little better than before, and the main camera is noticeably sharper than on the previous model. Colors look a bit more natural, and the dynamic range is better, but the ultra-wide camera is still pretty disappointing.

    And that's basically all that's new. There's still no silicon-carbon battery, no telephoto camera like on Nothing phones, and no wireless charging. The base model also still comes with only 128GB of storage, and it launched at €529, which was way too expensive.

    Now you can get it for around €300–350, and at that price it's a good phone. Not amazing, not outstanding, just good and a safe choice. Unfortunately, Samsung still plays it very safe and doesn't bring much innovation.

    Pros
    • Light and Thin
    • Beautiful Display
    • Main Cam got improved
    • Decent Performance
    Cons
    • Many Features missing (Telephoto, Wireless Charging etc)
    • The signal reception is weird
    • Battery could be better (6h SOT on 5G)
    • 7.8
    • Screen7.5
    • Performance8.0
    • Camera8.2
    • Connectivity7.3
    • Battery7.0
  • Auto
    I don't actually own it, but I've seen people who do and they've told me it's very good; perhaps it just needs a slightly better processor.

    • 9.4
    • Screen8.0
    • Performance8.3
    • Camera8.0
    • Connectivity9.0
    • Battery7.0
  • Auto
    It was a safe purchase in my opinion.

    I've had it for less than three months, and honestly, its performance is decent for the price. The overheating is practically nonexistent. I've held an iPhone 17 Pro, and that's real heat. The A57 reaches a maximum of 37 degrees Celsius under normal use. Obviously, it also depends on the city's temperature, but it's a resounding "No" to say the A57 has thermal management problems. The cameras are very decent, not the best, but the selfie camera beats any competition at the same price. Its processor is very well-balanced; it's not the most powerful in its class, obviously, but it handles anything smoothly under moderate use. Finally, its battery life is almost the same as a Xiaomi that claims to have 6000 or 7000 mAh, because Samsung's software is well-optimized, and that makes a big difference. I'm happy with my purchase because I know my investment is secure for several years.

    Pros
    • Battery
    • Performance
    • Selfie camera
    • Screen brightness and quality
    • Fluency
    • Software
    Cons
    • Fast charging could be better
    • Best IP certification
    • A more optimized processor
    • 9
    • Screen8.2
    • Performance9.3
    • Camera8.2
    • Connectivity10
    • Battery9.0
  • Auto
    It's a good mid-to-high-range phone

    It's very good in almost every aspect.

    Pros
    • The screen
    • Camera
    • Processor
    • He is thin
    • And it's comfortable to hold.
    • Battery
    Cons
    • It overheats a lot during demanding games
    • At first, the battery barely lasted.
    • 9.5
    • Screen9.5
    • Performance9.6
    • Camera8.7
    • Connectivity10
    • Battery7.0
  • Auto
    I expected more

    I wanted to try a mid-range Samsung to experience what so many people were recommending on social media. Unfortunately, it wasn't what I expected. Starting with the performance, which, considering the price of over $10,000 (at least in Mexico at launch), wasn't what I'd hoped for. It ran less demanding games "okay." The default camera left much to be desired. I absolutely had to use Pro mode to take photos. Otherwise, the images were simply bad. The screen is just okay, and the brightness in sunlight is lacking. The battery is the most redeeming feature; it charges quickly and fully in just over an hour, and the battery life was so long I almost had to charge the phone every two days.

    Pros
    • Battery
    • Screen
    • IP68
    • Weight
    Cons
    • Camera
    • Maximum brightness
    • Performance
    • Size
    • No wireless charging
    • User interface
    • 5.6
    • Screen4.0
    • Performance6.0
    • Camera6.5
    • Connectivity6.3
    • Battery10
  • Auto
    Excellent phone for everyday use. Plus, it has an excellent update policy.

    Pros
    • Good camera
    • Operating system
    • Premium design
    Cons
    • Processor (gets hot)
    • 10
    • Screen9.5
    • Performance9.3
    • Camera9.5
    • Connectivity10
    • Battery7.0
  • Auto
    GOOD COST-BENEFIT

    The best mid-range phone in the A series launched by the Korean company, a telephoto lens and a better charger would put it on another level.

    Pros
    • Light
    • Beautiful
    • Protection
    • Updates
    • Sound
    • 45w charging
    Cons
    • P2
    • It gets very hot.
    • Telephoto
    • 15w charger
    • 9.3
    • Screen9.2
    • Performance9.3
    • Camera8.7
    • Connectivity10
    • Battery9.0
  • Auto
    Forced landing, but on safe ground.

    Due to financial reasons, I had to make the difficult decision to sell my Galaxy S24 Ultra (512GB) and upgrade to the Galaxy A57 128GB. Obviously, the initial impact is daunting, but the truth is that the A57 surprised me positively. It delivers an extremely worthwhile experience for the price. The body is surprisingly thin (6.9 mm) and light, and the 120Hz Super AMOLED Plus screen is spectacular, maintaining that look I already loved in top-of-the-line phones. The Exynos 1680 processor handles daily use and social media well, although the loss of storage space from 512GB to 128GB forced me to manage my files more efficiently. It's not an Ultra, but it fulfills its purpose very well without causing frustration.

    Pros
    • Design
    • Screen
    • Battery
    Cons
    • Performance
    • Cameras
    • Storage
    • 8
    • Screen9.7
    • Performance8.6
    • Camera8.0
    • Connectivity10
    • Battery10
  • Auto
    Very good specifications but no telephoto lens

    Pros
    • Good operating system
    • Good screen
    Cons
    • It doesn't have a telephoto lens.
    • The load could be better
    • 8.8
    • Screen9.2
    • Performance8.0
    • Camera8.0
    • Battery9.0

This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.

Last update
October 16, 2026
State
  • Rumor
  • Presell
  • New
  • On Sale
Latest changes
  • New opinion 4 days ago
  • Camera 10 days ago
  • AnTuTu 10 days ago
  • Features 10 days ago
  • Version 1 month ago
  • Sensor Model, Sensor Model 2 months ago
  • Pros & Cons 4 months ago
  • Name, Storage 4 months ago
  • Version, Aliases, Market, SIM card 4 months ago
  • Camera, Camera 6 months ago
8.7
Ki Cost-effective
Score
  • 7.4 Design & Materials
  • 7.5 Performance & Hardware
  • 7.7 Camera
  • 7.8 Connectivity
  • 6.6 Battery
What is a Ki score?
Ki is an automatic score based on the specifications and prices of devices. It is calculated using over 200 variables to rank smartphones, tablets and other devices from best to worst.
How do we calculate the Ki?

In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:

  • Design and screen
  • Hardware and performance
  • Camera
  • Connectivity
  • Battery

Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.

Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.

Does the Ki score change?

The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.