you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Samsung Galaxy A57 5G reviews by real users Samsung Galaxy A57 5G
- "Ki" Value for Money Score8.6
- EfficiencyAGAA B C D EA B C D E
- Pros
- Display quality
- Design
- Dust and Water Resistance
Cons- Price
- USB 2.0
- 6.7"AMOLEDFHD+19.5:9
- 179 g76.8 mm161.5 mm6.9 mm
- Exynos 1680 Octa-Core 8 GB RAM 128 GB
- 1.120.000 v11
- 5000 mAh 45 W ~ 52h
- 1 50 Mpx ƒ/1.8 2 13 Mpx ƒ/2.2 3 5 Mpx ƒ/2.4 SELF 12 Mpx · ƒ/2.2
- Android 16 Android 16
User reviews
User score
- 21
- 3
- 0
- 1
- 0
- Screen9.1
- Performance9.0
- Camera8.8
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery8.5
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Let me sum it up for you
Kimovil users consider it a very balanced phone and an excellent mid-range device, highlighting its premium design and fluidity. They believe it offers good value for money, especially if purchased at a reduced price, although the initial price was high.
Design & Materials
According to our users, the screen is one of its strong points, described as beautiful, large, and high-quality, with top-notch brightness.
25 reviews
25 reviews
25 reviews
25 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, the performance is fluid and lag-free, although opinions on the processor vary, with some considering it just adequate.
25 reviews
25 reviews
25 reviews
Camera
According to our users, the cameras are good for daily use, with improvements to the main one, but the ultra-wide-angle and night performance could be better.
25 reviews
25 reviews
25 reviews
25 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, the phone lacks some features like wireless charging, and there's some mention of unusual signal reception.
25 reviews
25 reviews
25 reviews
Battery
According to our users, the battery is exceptional for intense daily use, although some find it could be improved and wish for greater capacity.
- 4%Less than half day
- 0%Less than a day
- 13%One day
- 67%More than one day
- 17%Two days or more
25 reviews
Software
- 8%It comes with a clean operating system
- 92%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 0%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
25 reviews
- 0%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 17%Every six months
- 83%Every two months or less
25 reviews
- Small improvements over the previous model, but nothing revolutionary.
The phone is thinner and lighter now, which I really like. But because it's still quite wide, it doesn't feel that comfortable to hold with one hand. The processor is only a little better than before, and the main camera is noticeably sharper than on the previous model. Colors look a bit more natural, and the dynamic range is better, but the ultra-wide camera is still pretty disappointing.
And that's basically all that's new. There's still no silicon-carbon battery, no telephoto camera like on Nothing phones, and no wireless charging. The base model also still comes with only 128GB of storage, and it launched at €529, which was way too expensive.
Now you can get it for around €300–350, and at that price it's a good phone. Not amazing, not outstanding, just good and a safe choice. Unfortunately, Samsung still plays it very safe and doesn't bring much innovation.Pros- Light and Thin
- Beautiful Display
- Main Cam got improved
- Decent Performance
Cons- Many Features missing (Telephoto, Wireless Charging etc)
- The signal reception is weird
- Battery could be better (6h SOT on 5G)
- 7.8
- Screen7.5
- Performance8.0
- Camera8.2
- Connectivity7.3
- Battery7.0
View answers - 10
- Screen10
- Performance10
- Camera10
- Connectivity10
- Battery10
View answers- 10
- Screen10
- Performance10
- Camera10
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers- AutoSimply one of the most well-balanced devices I've tested in recent months. Exceptional battery. Cameras are okay.
I would definitely use it for many years. In my experience, the battery lasted a day and a half with 9 hours of screen time. At the end of a day of heavy use (8 hours of screen time), 20% of the battery remains. However, it could come with a 45W charger in the box. For daily use, the camera is all you'll need; the night vision leaves something to be desired.
Pros- Battery life
- Cameras
- Ergonomics
- Design
- Low temperature
Cons- Charger
View original review- 8.8
- Screen10
- Performance8.3
- Camera8.7
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoAbsurd!
I switched from an S20 FE 5G fearing I'd regret buying the A57, but what an extraordinary phone! Everything about it surprised me: the screen, the sound, the processor, the customization, everything. However, not everything is perfect. Samsung should include a more powerful charger in the box, because I charge the phone from approximately 20 to 90 degrees Celsius, but it takes 2 hours to charge. It's not terrible, but it's a detail Samsung overlooked.
Pros- Screen
- Sound
- Processor
- Customization
- Battery
- Fluidity
Cons- Charger
View original review- 9.3
- Screen9.5
- Performance10
- Camera8.5
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery9.0
View answers - 10
- Screen10
- Performance10
- Camera10
- Connectivity10
- Battery10
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 15 days ago
- Sensor Model, Sensor Model 1 month ago
- Camera 1 month ago
- Pros & Cons 2 months ago
- Version 3 months ago
- Name, Storage 3 months ago
- Version, Aliases, Market, SIM card, Features 3 months ago
- Camera, Camera 5 months ago
- RAM 5 months ago
- AnTuTu, AnTuTu Version, Processor 5 months ago
Score
- 7.5 Design & Materials
- 7.4 Performance & Hardware
- 7.7 Camera
- 7.7 Connectivity
- 6.6 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
