Samsung Galaxy A57 5G reviews by real users Samsung Galaxy A57 5G
- 6.7"AMOLEDFHD+19.5:9
- 179 g76.8 mm161.5 mm6.9 mm
- Exynos 1680 Octa-Core 8 GB RAM 128 GB
- 1.120.000 v11
- 5000 mAh 45 W ~ 52h
- 1 50 Mpx ƒ/1.8 2 8 Mpx ƒ/2.2 3 5 Mpx ƒ/2.4 SELF 12 Mpx · ƒ/2.2
- Android 16 Android 16
User reviews
User score
Design & Materials
7 reviews
7 reviews
7 reviews
7 reviews
Performance & Hardware
7 reviews
7 reviews
7 reviews
Camera
7 reviews
7 reviews
7 reviews
7 reviews
Connectivity
7 reviews
7 reviews
7 reviews
Battery
- 14%Less than half day
- 0%Less than a day
- 29%One day
- 57%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
7 reviews
Software
- 29%It comes with a clean operating system
- 71%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 0%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
7 reviews
- 0%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 33%Every six months
- 67%Every two months or less
7 reviews
- 8.2
- Screen8.2
- Performance7.3
- Camera6.2
- Connectivity7.6
- Battery7.0
View answers- 8.7
- Screen9.5
- Performance8.0
- Camera9.0
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery9.0
View answers- AutoI expected more
The phone feels good in the hand, but the design is starting to look the same. The cameras and processor are just adequate. The biggest problem is the battery. Samsung seems too lax and isn't keeping up with the trend of increasing battery capacity. As a result, phones with 7000mAh batteries last all day, while with a Samsung, you won't even make it to midday. That's the reality. I don't recommend it. My other phone was an Honor Magic 7 Lite, better than the Samsung in every way. The problem with this phone is the screen; it breaks just by looking at it. It's the most fragile phone I've ever owned. €260, and it only lasted me a month. It's a piece of junk. This one does have a very good battery. A Samsung with a better camera and a battery like this would be fantastic. Samsung's prices should be more realistic. They offer the same as other brands for twice the price and always with a battery half the size.
View original review- 3.3
- Screen4.7
- Performance5.3
- Camera4.5
- Connectivity6.0
- Battery0.0
View answers - AutoBalanced and reliable but with a disproportionate initial price.
In Peru, the 12/512GB version was released for 2400 soles (US$699), but it wasn't worth it at that price. Weeks later, I managed to get it for 1930 soles (US$572) on their app. The battery life is very good for my heavy use of social media and photos, the brightness is decent, the design is good, the charging is decent but not as fast as the competition, the audio is decent but could be improved in my opinion, it runs One UI 8.5, the cameras are decent, and the selfie camera is very good in good conditions, although it doesn't have autofocus. The back should have been matte to reduce fingerprints.
Pros- Very good battery life for basic tasks
- Good daytime selfie
- Cameras with accurate colors
- Software
- Design and durability
Cons- Starting price
- Performance
- Macro dispensable
- Absence of telephoto lens
- Few generational improvements
View original review- 7.7
- Screen8.0
- Performance7.3
- Camera7.5
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoFine
This phone is half as thin as the A55, the premium materials are what you pay for, and I was surprised by the battery life—it's lasting me more than a day (at 80%). It's also much smoother, especially the fingerprint reader. The bezels are thinner, and the screen looks bigger.
Pros- Battery
- Fluency
- Design
- Screen
Cons- Demand on camera
View original review- 9.5
- Screen8.0
- Performance8.0
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity7.3
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.