you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Samsung Galaxy A57 5G reviews by real users Samsung Galaxy A57 5G
- "Ki" Value for Money Score8.1
- EfficiencyAGAA B C D EA B C D E
- Pros
- Display quality
- Design
- Dust and Water Resistance
Cons- Price
- USB 2.0
- 6.7"AMOLEDFHD+19.5:9
- 179 g76.8 mm161.5 mm6.9 mm
- Exynos 1680 Octa-Core 8 GB RAM 128 GB
- 1.120.000 v11
- 5000 mAh 45 W ~ 52h
- 1 50 Mpx ƒ/1.8 2 8 Mpx ƒ/2.2 3 5 Mpx ƒ/2.4 SELF 12 Mpx · ƒ/2.2
- Android 16 Android 16
User reviews
User score
- 16
- 2
- 0
- 1
- 0
- Screen9.0
- Performance8.9
- Camera8.7
- Connectivity8.8
- Battery8.4
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Let me sum it up for you
Kimovil users consider it a good mid-range phone, highlighting its value for money if acquired at a reasonable price. They appreciate its slim and premium design, though some expected more innovation and found the initial price to be high.
Design & Materials
According to our users, the screen is one of its strong points, described as "top" and "beautiful," with good brightness and a great visual experience.
19 reviews
19 reviews
19 reviews
19 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, performance is fluid in daily use, but the processor is "a bit limited" and sometimes slow when opening apps.
19 reviews
19 reviews
19 reviews
Camera
According to our users, the main camera has improved, offering good quality and accurate colors, although the ultra-wide-angle camera is disappointing.
19 reviews
19 reviews
19 reviews
19 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, connectivity has shortcomings, such as strange signal reception and the absence of wireless charging.
19 reviews
19 reviews
19 reviews
Battery
According to our users, the battery generates divided opinions; some find it good, while others consider it insufficient for intense use.
- 5%Less than half day
- 0%Less than a day
- 16%One day
- 63%More than one day
- 16%Two days or more
19 reviews
Software
- 11%It comes with a clean operating system
- 89%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 0%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
19 reviews
- 0%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 17%Every six months
- 83%Every two months or less
19 reviews
- Small improvements over the previous model, but nothing revolutionary.
The phone is thinner and lighter now, which I really like. But because it's still quite wide, it doesn't feel that comfortable to hold with one hand. The processor is only a little better than before, and the main camera is noticeably sharper than on the previous model. Colors look a bit more natural, and the dynamic range is better, but the ultra-wide camera is still pretty disappointing.
And that's basically all that's new. There's still no silicon-carbon battery, no telephoto camera like on Nothing phones, and no wireless charging. The base model also still comes with only 128GB of storage, and it launched at €529, which was way too expensive.
Now you can get it for around €300–350, and at that price it's a good phone. Not amazing, not outstanding, just good and a safe choice. Unfortunately, Samsung still plays it very safe and doesn't bring much innovation.Pros- Light and Thin
- Beautiful Display
- Main Cam got improved
- Decent Performance
Cons- Many Features missing (Telephoto, Wireless Charging etc)
- The signal reception is weird
- Battery could be better (6h SOT on 5G)
- 7.8
- Screen7.5
- Performance8.0
- Camera8.2
- Connectivity7.3
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoAbsurd!
I switched from an S20 FE 5G fearing I'd regret buying the A57, but what an extraordinary phone! Everything about it surprised me: the screen, the sound, the processor, the customization, everything. However, not everything is perfect. Samsung should include a more powerful charger in the box, because I charge the phone from approximately 20 to 90 degrees Celsius, but it takes 2 hours to charge. It's not terrible, but it's a detail Samsung overlooked.
Pros- Screen
- Sound
- Processor
- Customization
- Battery
- Fluidity
Cons- Charger
View original review- 9.3
- Screen9.5
- Performance10
- Camera8.5
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery9.0
View answers - 10
- Screen10
- Performance10
- Camera10
- Connectivity10
- Battery10
View answers- 10
- Screen10
- Performance10
- Camera10
- Connectivity10
- Battery10
View answers- 10
- Screen10
- Performance10
- Camera10
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 6 days ago
- Pros & Cons 1 month ago
- Version 1 month ago
- Name, Storage 1 month ago
- Version, Aliases, Market, SIM card, Features 1 month ago
- Camera, Camera 3 months ago
- RAM 3 months ago
- AnTuTu, AnTuTu Version, Processor 3 months ago
- Photos, Photos 3 months ago
- Width, Height, Thickness, Weight, Bluetooth, SAR, SAR, SAR, SAR 3 months ago
Score
- 7.5 Design & Materials
- 7.4 Performance & Hardware
- 6.4 Camera
- 7.7 Connectivity
- 6.7 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
