you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Samsung Galaxy A57 5G reviews by real users Samsung Galaxy A57 5G
- "Ki" Value for Money Score8.7
- EfficiencyAGAA B C D EA B C D E
- Pros
- Display quality
- Design
- Dust and Water Resistance
Cons- Price
- USB 2.0
- 6.7"AMOLEDFHD+19.5:9
- 179 g76.8 mm161.5 mm6.9 mm
- Exynos 1680 Octa-Core 8 GB RAM 128 GB
- 1.359.649 v11
- 5000 mAh 45 W ~ 52h
- 1 50 Mpx ƒ/1.8 2 13 Mpx ƒ/2.2 3 5 Mpx ƒ/2.4 SELF 12 Mpx · ƒ/2.2
- Android 16 Android 16
User reviews
User score
- 27
- 4
- 1
- 1
- 0
- Screen9.0
- Performance8.9
- Camera8.7
- Connectivity9.1
- Battery8.5
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Let me sum it up for you
Kimovil users consider it an excellent mid-premium range device, praising its good value for money, especially when acquired at a competitive price. There's general agreement on its thin, light, and premium design, as well as its update policy. However, some users expected more innovation.
Design & Materials
According to our users, the 120Hz Super AMOLED Plus screen is spectacular, vibrant, and high-quality, with thin bezels.
33 reviews
33 reviews
33 reviews
33 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, performance is fluid for daily use. Opinions on the processor are varied, with some noting occasional heating or sluggishness.
33 reviews
33 reviews
33 reviews
Camera
According to our users, the main camera is competent and improved, delivering good daytime results. The ultra-wide-angle camera is disappointing, and the lack of a telephoto lens is criticized.
33 reviews
33 reviews
33 reviews
33 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, the absence of a 3.5mm jack and wireless charging are drawbacks. One user also reports unusual signal reception.
33 reviews
33 reviews
33 reviews
Battery
According to our users, the battery provides very good autonomy, lasting more than a day. The included 15W charger is a common complaint.
- 3%Less than half day
- 0%Less than a day
- 19%One day
- 59%More than one day
- 19%Two days or more
33 reviews
Software
- 9%It comes with a clean operating system
- 88%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 3%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
33 reviews
- 0%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 13%Every six months
- 87%Every two months or less
33 reviews
- Small improvements over the previous model, but nothing revolutionary.
The phone is thinner and lighter now, which I really like. But because it's still quite wide, it doesn't feel that comfortable to hold with one hand. The processor is only a little better than before, and the main camera is noticeably sharper than on the previous model. Colors look a bit more natural, and the dynamic range is better, but the ultra-wide camera is still pretty disappointing.
And that's basically all that's new. There's still no silicon-carbon battery, no telephoto camera like on Nothing phones, and no wireless charging. The base model also still comes with only 128GB of storage, and it launched at €529, which was way too expensive.
Now you can get it for around €300–350, and at that price it's a good phone. Not amazing, not outstanding, just good and a safe choice. Unfortunately, Samsung still plays it very safe and doesn't bring much innovation.Pros- Light and Thin
- Beautiful Display
- Main Cam got improved
- Decent Performance
Cons- Many Features missing (Telephoto, Wireless Charging etc)
- The signal reception is weird
- Battery could be better (6h SOT on 5G)
- 7.8
- Screen7.5
- Performance8.0
- Camera8.2
- Connectivity7.3
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoIt was a safe purchase in my opinion.
I've had it for less than three months, and honestly, its performance is decent for the price. The overheating is practically nonexistent. I've held an iPhone 17 Pro, and that's real heat. The A57 reaches a maximum of 37 degrees Celsius under normal use. Obviously, it also depends on the city's temperature, but it's a resounding "No" to say the A57 has thermal management problems. The cameras are very decent, not the best, but the selfie camera beats any competition at the same price. Its processor is very well-balanced; it's not the most powerful in its class, obviously, but it handles anything smoothly under moderate use. Finally, its battery life is almost the same as a Xiaomi that claims to have 6000 or 7000 mAh, because Samsung's software is well-optimized, and that makes a big difference. I'm happy with my purchase because I know my investment is secure for several years.
Pros- Battery
- Performance
- Selfie camera
- Screen brightness and quality
- Fluency
- Software
Cons- Fast charging could be better
- Best IP certification
- A more optimized processor
View original review- 9
- Screen8.2
- Performance9.3
- Camera8.2
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers - 9.5
- Screen9.5
- Performance9.6
- Camera8.7
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers- AutoI expected more
I wanted to try a mid-range Samsung to experience what so many people were recommending on social media. Unfortunately, it wasn't what I expected. Starting with the performance, which, considering the price of over $10,000 (at least in Mexico at launch), wasn't what I'd hoped for. It ran less demanding games "okay." The default camera left much to be desired. I absolutely had to use Pro mode to take photos. Otherwise, the images were simply bad. The screen is just okay, and the brightness in sunlight is lacking. The battery is the most redeeming feature; it charges quickly and fully in just over an hour, and the battery life was so long I almost had to charge the phone every two days.
Pros- Battery
- Screen
- IP68
- Weight
Cons- Camera
- Maximum brightness
- Performance
- Size
- No wireless charging
- User interface
View original review- 5.6
- Screen4.0
- Performance6.0
- Camera6.5
- Connectivity6.3
- Battery10
View answers - 9.3
- Screen9.2
- Performance9.3
- Camera8.7
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers- AutoForced landing, but on safe ground.
Due to financial reasons, I had to make the difficult decision to sell my Galaxy S24 Ultra (512GB) and upgrade to the Galaxy A57 128GB. Obviously, the initial impact is daunting, but the truth is that the A57 surprised me positively. It delivers an extremely worthwhile experience for the price. The body is surprisingly thin (6.9 mm) and light, and the 120Hz Super AMOLED Plus screen is spectacular, maintaining that look I already loved in top-of-the-line phones. The Exynos 1680 processor handles daily use and social media well, although the loss of storage space from 512GB to 128GB forced me to manage my files more efficiently. It's not an Ultra, but it fulfills its purpose very well without causing frustration.
Pros- Design
- Screen
- Battery
Cons- Performance
- Cameras
- Storage
View original review- 8
- Screen9.7
- Performance8.6
- Camera8.0
- Connectivity10
- Battery10
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 4 days ago
- Camera 10 days ago
- AnTuTu 10 days ago
- Features 10 days ago
- Version 1 month ago
- Sensor Model, Sensor Model 2 months ago
- Pros & Cons 4 months ago
- Name, Storage 4 months ago
- Version, Aliases, Market, SIM card 4 months ago
- Camera, Camera 6 months ago
Score
- 7.4 Design & Materials
- 7.5 Performance & Hardware
- 7.7 Camera
- 7.8 Connectivity
- 6.6 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
