you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Samsung Galaxy M13 reviews by real users Samsung Galaxy M13
- "Ki" Value for Money Score6.5
- Pros
- Battery
- NFC
- Charger included
Cons- Night photos
- No good for gaming
- No 5G
- 6.6"TFT LCD (IPS)FHD+20:9
- 192 g76.9 mm165.4 mm8.4 mm
- Exynos 850 Octa-Core 4 GB RAM 64 GB
- 117.300 v8
- 5000 mAh 15 W
- 1 50 Mpx ƒ/1.8 2 5 Mpx ƒ/2.2 3 2 Mpx ƒ/2.4 4 2 Mpx ƒ/2.4 SELF 8 Mpx · ƒ/2.2
- Android 12 Snow Cone Android 12
User reviews
User score
- 0
- 5
- 6
- 1
- 0
- Screen7.0
- Performance4.8
- Camera6.1
- Connectivity7.9
- Battery7.3
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Let me sum it up for you
Kimovil users consider this smartphone a decent option for basic use or as a secondary phone, highlighting its good initial value for money. However, there is a general consensus regarding its performance degradation over time, becoming slow and frustrating, especially after software updates.
Design & Materials
According to our users, the screen is a strong point, with good quality, colors, and brightness, although the processor limits the full utilization of its 90Hz.
12 reviews
12 reviews
12 reviews
12 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, performance is its biggest weakness, with a slow processor and limited RAM causing poor fluidity, especially after updates and when playing games or watching videos.
12 reviews
12 reviews
12 reviews
Camera
According to our users, the cameras offer acceptable results initially but worsen over time, with criticisms regarding night quality and video recording.
12 reviews
12 reviews
12 reviews
12 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, connectivity is basic; they criticize the absence of NFC, slow charging, and the lack of an included charger, in addition to occasional issues with Bluetooth.
12 reviews
12 reviews
12 reviews
Battery
According to our users, the battery is one of its most positive aspects, offering excellent autonomy for daily use, although there is an isolated opinion indicating otherwise.
- 0%Less than half day
- 17%Less than a day
- 50%One day
- 33%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
12 reviews
Software
- 0%It comes with a clean operating system
- 92%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 8%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
12 reviews
- 0%Never
- 8%Once a year
- 83%Every six months
- 8%Every two months or less
12 reviews
- Great screen and battery for the price, but Android 14 made the system a bit heavier.
I’ve been using the Galaxy M13 (SM-M135M) and overall the experience is positive. The display has good quality for its class, with decent colors and brightness, and the 5,000 mAh battery offers excellent autonomy. Gaming performance is reasonable, fine for light and mid-range titles but nothing outstanding for heavy games. After updating to Android 14 with One UI 6.1, I noticed the system became a bit heavier compared to previous versions. It’s also worth noting that the device runs in 32-bit mode, even though the processor is 64-bit capable. Despite these points, it’s still a reliable phone with good value for money.
Pros- Good display for its category
- Excellent battery life
- Guaranteed software updates from Samsung
- Good value for money
- Stable everyday experience
Cons- System runs in 32-bit mode
- Only basic gaming performance
- System became heavier after Android 14
- Relatively slow charging
- Simple plastic build
- 8
- Screen9.0
- Performance7.3
- Camera7.6
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoThe phone itself works fine, I've had it for 2 years now and it hasn't given me any problems.
The phone isn't very powerful, but it has Android 14 and works well. It used to take good photos, but they've gotten worse over time. I would recommend it for daily use, but there are better options for the price. Overall, though, the phone is good.
Pros- Battery
- Screen
- It's going well.
- Good design
Cons- Little ram
- Only 64GB
- Charger not included
- 15w
View original review- 7.9
- Screen10
- Performance7.0
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoFor a secondary phone, it's a 9 out of 10. I give the screen a 10 and the sound a 7. Recommended for secondary use, 100%.
It should have at least 4/128 and not 64, but it's a very nice, comfortable color and a very good brand.
Pros- It's nice, has a good screen, good color, good battery, USB charging, three cameras, and a good brand.
Cons- 4GB of RAM does not come with a charger
- Minimum 6GB, not 4
View original review- 7.8
- Screen8.7
- Performance5.6
- Camera7.7
- Connectivity9.5
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoA good budget phone. We don't expect anything excellent. It is sufficient for daily use, but not for long continuous hours because the battery is not enough.Pros
- cheap
- Good drop resistance
- Daily uses
Cons- Battery does not last long
- Weak at games
- Not many apps are compatible.
- It can't play high-resolution clips especially smoothly.
- Very shaky when recording video
- the heat
View original review- 5
- Screen6.7
- Performance5.6
- Camera6.5
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoThe basics of the basics for everyday use
It was a good smartphone at first, but over time it got slower and slower and was often frustrating to use. The biggest problem is when it comes to videos from the Meta company, such as Instagram and Facebook, where it is practically impossible to watch a video without it stuttering and freezing. For the price paid in 2022 (R$923) it was a good smartphone for a few months, but soon after I discovered in practice that this chipset (Exynos 850) and the OneUI updates degraded the user experience too much. Today in 07/2025 I do not recommend this smartphone, perhaps not even if it is used at a very low price (under R$500), there are better new things and for little more than that.
Pros- Screen density and size
Cons- No NFC
- No screen mirroring
- Very bad processor that gets hot
- Charger less powerful than the smartphone supports
- OneUI updates degraded performance
View original review- 3.4
- Screen5.7
- Performance3.3
- Camera5.2
- Connectivity6.6
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoESSENTIAL
My phone didn't last long, because it broke down during the first update and I had to return it. The time I had it I was able to enjoy a better screen than I expected, but it was frustratingly slow. It's an entry-level phone and you can't ask for more. PS.- After having other entry-level phones, I think you could ask for a lot more.
Pros- Screen
- Battery
Cons- Slowness
- Night camera
- Died while updating
View original review- 5.1
- Screen6.7
- Performance6.5
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity8.3
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoCell phone for basic use and for a little more
Well, it is a basic cell phone in quotes with a terrible processor, cameras, quite acceptable but with the big problem that the processor limits the camera a lot but even so with that limitation you can get good use of the camera with the only problem that its mode pro is incomplete In the almost 2 years that I have had this cell phone, the truth is that I have been surprised by its great resistance to impacts since I have dropped the cell phone several times and the screen is still excellent with a few scratches that are barely visible. Something that I have noticed over time is that the cell phone is becoming obsolete either in basic applications or in applications with a little more demand in day to day life with the cell phone sometimes it can get stuck well but in the end due to the price of the cell phone maybe I don't know you can expect more in the end, it is a low-mid-range cell phone
Pros- Battery
- Screen
- Durability
Cons- Medium camera
- Fluency
- Software
- Screen brightness
- Processor
- SPF
View original review- 6
- Screen5.5
- Performance1.6
- Camera3.6
- Connectivity6.6
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoIt is clearly a slow phone
Besides being slow, due to the processor I guess, at least on the pre-installed Android version 13(Tiramisu), it has less functionality than the M30S I had before it. Less options in the settings to adapt to my tastes and needs. There is no chance of course that it has a virus or a trojan, the reason it is slow is 99% the one I mentioned at the beginning! Below average camera quality. Finally, it does NOT come with a charger, but only with a USB-C to USB-C cable. Also, my headset, which I connect to various devices, without the following problem, sometimes plays in mono, when I connect it with Bluetooth, and the only way to play again stereo is the reboot and of course it takes about 2.5 minutes to be ready to use on a reboot. I am sorry because I have bought 2 other Samsung devices. This one is not worth the money at all! (€160 in August 2023)Also the connectivity rating, it's because kimovil doesn't ask me to rate the bluetooth....
View original review- 5.8
- Screen6.7
- Performance1.5
- Camera3.7
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 3 months ago
- Version 3 years ago
- Version, Name, Market, SIM card, SIM card, Features 3 years ago
- Pros & Cons 3 years ago
- Resolution, Resolution, Resolution 3 years ago
- Thickness, Weight, Capacity (mAh), Photos 3 years ago
- Similar name 3 years ago
- RAM 3 years ago
- On Sale 4 years ago
- Storage 4 years ago
Score
- 5.7 Design & Materials
- 5.3 Performance & Hardware
- 5.8 Camera
- 6.6 Connectivity
- 6.3 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
