you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Opinions from the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
- 6.8"AMOLEDWQHD+19.5:9
- 227 g77.9 mm163.3 mm8.9 mm
- Exynos 2200 Octa-Core 8 GB RAM 128 GB
- v10 1.023.311
- 5000 mAh
- 1 108 Mpx · ƒ/1.8 S5KHM3 234SELF 40 Mpx · ƒ/2.2
- Android 13 Tiramisu Android 13
User score
- 43
- 5
- 3
- 0
- 0
- Screen9.0
- Performance9.2
- Camera9.5
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery7.7
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
51 reviews
51 reviews
51 reviews
51 reviews
Performance & Hardware
51 reviews
51 reviews
51 reviews
Camera
51 reviews
51 reviews
51 reviews
51 reviews
Connectivity
51 reviews
51 reviews
51 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 16%Less than a day
- 37%One day
- 43%More than one day
- 4%Two days or more
51 reviews
Software
- 8%It comes with a clean operating system
- 82%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 10%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
51 reviews
- 0%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 19%Every six months
- 81%Every two months or less
51 reviews
User reviews
- A beast flagship with one downside
This is a beast of a phone, literally a computer in your hand, the only downside is the subpar battery performance, but is understandable with it's huge 6.8 screen and QHD + 120hz refresh rate on.
Pros- Screen
- Cameras
- S-Pen
- Build quality
Cons- Battery
- 9
- Screen7.5
- Performance9.0
- Camera10
- Connectivity6.6
- Battery7.0
View answers - Not as good as the s21 ultra
I decided to upgrade from the s21 ultra because I used to have all the note devices back in the day. Kind of wish I stayed with the s21 ultra as I believe the battery was better, it worked more smoothly, the camera was definitely better (especially with night shots and zoom) and it didn't hurt my fingers when holding it.
Pros- The ultimate multitasking tool
- The camera is very versatile
- Screens very bright in direct light
- S-pens been squeezed in
Cons- Battery isn't as good as s21 ultra
- Quite laggy
- Might shots have a weird halo around them
- Zoom isn't as sharp as s21ultra
- 6.7
- Screen7.2
- Performance4.3
- Camera8.0
- Connectivity8.6
- Battery5.0
View answers - Not a bad Smartphone but...
Samsung's product policy is very difficult to understand. Almost nothing has changed or improved and the software has as many bugs as a 200€ smartphone.
Do not misunderstand, it is a good smartphone with good camera, very good display and long software support, but at the price and against the background that there are hardly any differences to the predecessor, these circumstances are unacceptable.Pros- Very Good and Bright Display (120Hz, WQHD+) 1750 nits
- Long software support (5 years)
- Good camera (especially zoom)
Cons- No real improvements and innovations
- Poor Performance (Currently)
- Starting With 8 GB RAM instead of 12
- 45 watt charging makes no difference
- Poor video quality for the price
- 6
- Screen9.2
- Performance6.0
- Camera9.0
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - 9
- Screen8.0
- Performance9.0
- Camera9.0
- Connectivity8.6
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 4 days ago
- Version 10 months ago
- Features 10 months ago
- SIM card 1 year ago
- Density 1 year ago
- Battery Composition 1 year ago
- Resolution 1 year ago
- SIM card 1 year ago
- Name, Storage 1 year ago
- RAM 1 year ago
Score
- 8.8 Design & Materials
- 8.2 Performance & Hardware
- 8.6 Camera
- 8.8 Connectivity
- 8.2 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.