you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Tecno Spark 30C reviews by real users Tecno Spark 30C
- "Ki" Value for Money ScoreNo price,
no Ki - Pros
- Stereo Speakers
- Design
Cons- Slow SOC
- System lag
- Overheating
- External Storage
- 6.67"LCD IPSHD+21:9
- 187 g76.0 mm163.9 mm8.5 mm
- Helio G81 Octa-Core 4 GB RAM 128 GB
- 262.145 v10
- 5000 mAh 18 W
- 1 48 Mpx Unknow 2 0.8 Mpx Unknow SELF 8 Mpx · Unknow
- Android 14 Upside-down cake Android 14
User reviews
User score
- 5
- 3
- 8
- 2
- 1
- Screen6.3
- Performance5.1
- Camera5.7
- Connectivity7.2
- Battery6.0
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Let me sum it up for you
The general sentiment among Kimovil users is that this phone is a mediocre and not very recommendable option, especially considering its quality-price ratio. They believe there are better alternatives on the market. While some appreciate its design and find it suitable for very basic use, the majority report a frustrating experience and deficient performance.
Design & Materials
According to our users, the screen offers 120Hz and a large size, although some mention it as a general negative point without specifying the reason.
19 reviews
19 reviews
19 reviews
19 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, the performance is very deficient, with constant freezes, slowness in basic apps, and overheating, attributed to its obsolete processor and low RAM.
19 reviews
19 reviews
19 reviews
Camera
According to our users, the cameras are a weak point; the front camera is very poor, and the rear cameras only offer acceptable results in good light, performing deficiently at night.
19 reviews
19 reviews
19 reviews
19 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, connectivity is limited; they appreciate the Dual SIM option but regret the absence of 5G network support on this device.
19 reviews
19 reviews
19 reviews
Battery
According to our users, the battery generates divided opinions; some praise it, but many report that its duration is insufficient for continuous use, despite its 5000mAh.
- 0%Less than half day
- 55%Less than a day
- 40%One day
- 5%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
19 reviews
Software
- 11%It comes with a clean operating system
- 68%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 21%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
19 reviews
- 0%Never
- 29%Once a year
- 43%Every six months
- 29%Every two months or less
19 reviews
- AutoVisual Cancer Just Taking It Out of the Box
This phone is a piece of junk. For someone who wants it for basic use, it'll be fine, but with limitations. Its performance on social media and light apps is already terrible. The battery is beyond saving; due to the poor optimization of its processor, the Helio G81 drains in the blink of an eye. The water and drop resistance is passable, but don't be fooled. One throw in the pool and that's it, if corrosion doesn't get the better of it. The cameras for this segment are awful; it seems like a security camera takes better pictures than this device. That said, its price and charging speed are tempting, but remember that you're practically carrying a brick in your hands that will last you less than a year. It's a miracle if it lasts two years, but even then it fails to prove it's worth it.
Pros- Burden
- Price
- Battery
Cons- Emmc 5.1
- Overheating
- Poorly optimized operating system
- Cameras
View original review- 4.1
- Screen4.2
- Performance2.6
- Camera3.2
- Connectivity4.6
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoGood, nice, and cheap.
It's a very elegant phone, resistant to splashes and dust. For an entry-level phone, it's very smooth, with excellent connectivity, which is a real plus living in Cuba. It's modern, and the LCD screen is very sharp, it feels comfortable in the hand, and it has built-in artificial intelligence. I loved it; I wasn't expecting so much. I'll definitely stick with this brand.
View original review- 9.4
- Screen9.7
- Performance8.3
- Camera9.7
- Connectivity9.6
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoHonestly, it's really bad; there are better options for that price.
Honestly, my experience with this phone was pretty mediocre. I've had it for a little over a year and it's quite disappointing. Although it's an "entry-level" phone, there are better options like the Infinix Hot 50i, which costs a bit more than this phone.
Pros- Battery life
Cons- It gets very hot.
- It only has 4 GB of RAM
View original review- 3.3
- Screen5.2
- Performance2.6
- Camera2.7
- Connectivity4.3
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoQuite generic
For a phone released in 2024, it performs relatively well for general users. However, the downside of this device is its hardware. It uses a 2019 entry-level chip. When you bought it, like any phone, it was relatively good, but as 2025 progressed, it began to deteriorate for the same reasons I mentioned earlier. The cameras are another negative point. Photos from the rear cameras are relatively good during the day, but they are poor at night. The front camera is also extremely bad. I know it's currently a low-to-mid-range device, but I don't recommend it. It's better to try and buy a better one for the same price or a little more.
Pros- Design
Cons- Camera
- Screen
- Heating
- Chip
- GPU
View original review- 4
- Screen4.7
- Performance5.0
- Camera2.7
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoBad
I honestly don't know if it was my device or if they're all like that, but it often freezes with undemanding apps like TikTok or Clash Royale, kicking me out of the app. The camera isn't too bad for the price.
Pros- Size
- Material
Cons- Processor
- RAM
- It interferes with some social networks
View original review- 4.1
- Screen6.5
- Performance4.6
- Camera6.7
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 18 days ago
- Pros & Cons 4 months ago
- Camera, Sensor Model 1 year ago
- Version 1 year ago
- Features 1 year ago
- Name, RAM, Storage 1 year ago
- Usable surface 1 year ago
- Width, Height, Thickness, Weight 1 year ago
- AnTuTu Version 1 year ago
- AnTuTu 1 year ago
Score
no Ki
- 6.5 Design & Materials
- 5.7 Performance & Hardware
- 6.2 Camera
- 6.4 Connectivity
- 6.1 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
