you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Tecno Spark Go 1 reviews by real users Tecno Spark Go 1
- "Ki" Value for Money Score6.6
- Pros
- Powerfull SOC
- Screen refresh rate
Cons- Low display brightness
- Price
- System lag
- Charging Speed
- 6.67"LCD IPSHD+20:9
- 189 g77.0 mm165.6 mm8.3 mm
- Unisoc T615 Octa-Core 3 GB RAM 64 GB
- 308.681 v10
- 5000 mAh 15 W
- 1 13 Mpx ƒ/1.8 2 0.3 Mpx Unknow SELF 8 Mpx · Unknow
- Android 14 Upside-down cake Android 14
User reviews
User score
- 7
- 3
- 2
- 0
- 1
- Screen6.9
- Performance7.2
- Camera6.1
- Connectivity7.9
- Battery7.5
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Let me sum it up for you
Kimovil users believe this is a phone with excellent value for money, highlighting its low cost. They consider it a good option for tight budgets, although there are divided opinions on its general performance and the Android Go experience.
Design & Materials
According to our users, the 120Hz screen is appreciated, but its HD+ resolution is just adequate and the brightness under sunlight is insufficient.
13 reviews
13 reviews
13 reviews
13 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, performance is varied. The processor holds its own in basic games, but the low RAM and eMMC 5.1 cause sluggishness.
13 reviews
13 reviews
13 reviews
Camera
According to our users, the camera is acceptable for its price, although the 13MP falls short. Photos are not its strong suit.
13 reviews
13 reviews
13 reviews
13 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, stereo sound and IP54 protection are positive points. However, they criticize the lack of 5G and unstable internet signal.
13 reviews
13 reviews
13 reviews
Battery
According to our users, the battery performance is just adequate, although some appreciate it. The slow 10W charging is a highly criticized point.
- 0%Less than half day
- 15%Less than a day
- 46%One day
- 38%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
13 reviews
Software
- 8%It comes with a clean operating system
- 92%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 0%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
13 reviews
- 20%Never
- 20%Once a year
- 30%Every six months
- 30%Every two months or less
13 reviews
- Not very comfortable
The 120hz is just a gimmick, the real is 90hz
And is use Android Go, So there are many basic features that are not available on Android Go (even though it's Android 14)
FusiMem (Additional RAM) Does not bring significant changesPros- Cheap (I think)
Cons- Android Go
- One rear camera
- sometimes the internet signal is bad
- 4.9
- Screen5.0
- Performance8.0
- Camera5.2
- Connectivity6.6
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoGood experience
For its price, the device performs adequately in terms of cameras. The processor holds its own in complex games like Ark, Asphalt 9, and Call of Duty, among others. The 120Hz refresh rate is only truly enjoyable in games, as the screen uses adaptive technology, so the interface only utilizes 90Hz. Battery life is just adequate; it doesn't disappoint. The screen falls short at HD+, but advanced users can get the most out of it by adjusting the pixel density to achieve something similar to FHD+.
Pros- 120Hz, since for the same price the maximum is 90Hz
- Guaranteed for 4 years with no loss of performance
- Stereo sound, which is not common in its range
- Very well optimized processor
- Guaranteed with 2 years of security patches
- IP54 protection
Cons- The resolution falls short for a 6.7-inch screen.
- RAM, although it's LPDR4, is insufficient by today's standards.
- Android 14GB
View original review- 8.6
- Screen8.5
- Performance9.3
- Camera7.2
- Connectivity8.3
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoVery good quality
The drawbacks of course are that it's not UFS yet, it's not 5G, the RAM is very small, and the current 13MP camera produces somewhat less photo results.
Pros- very good for a cheap phone
Cons- The downside of course is that the RAM is still 4GB which is already too small for this year!!
View original review- 8.7
- Screen7.2
- Performance9.0
- Camera6.0
- Connectivity7.6
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoThe best for its price
I give this opinion because I bought the cell phone for 75 since I acquired a plan and benefits apart that for its price it crushes many Honor and Samsung like the A05 in performance and much more, hence this review.
Pros- Battery
- Screen
- Warranty
- Performance
- Quality price not like Samsung and others
Cons- EMMC storage but performs well
View original review- 10
- Screen10
- Performance10
- Camera10
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoIt is a cell phone for low-income people because it does not meet daily needs.
THE SCREEN AT "120HZ" IS FALSE IT STAGS TOO MUCH IT IS AS IF YOU HAD A 90HZ SCREEN IT DOES NOT LOOK WELL IN FULL SUN LITTLE RAM THE SCREEN DOES LIKE LIGHT CUTTING (ALL WAYS ON DISPLAY FALSE) IT TURNS ON FROM THE ND THE TRUTH IS A DEVICE THAT IS NOT WORTH PURCHASING IT, ALSO WITH A UNISOC PROCESSOR
View original review- 4.6
- Screen3.7
- Performance4.3
- Camera3.5
- Connectivity7.6
- Battery7.0
View answers - 10
- Screen7.0
- Performance7.0
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery7.0
View answers- AutoIt's an excellent phone for the price, you can't ask for more for less than $100
It is a good cell phone, you have to understand that it is an inexpensive entry-level range, you cannot buy it thinking that it will run the most demanding games on the Playstore. It offers a 120hz refresh rate, stereo speakers, the processor is new and performs very well even in games like CoD Mobile in low graphics.
Pros- Processor
- Battery
- 120hz soda cup
- It has good fluidity considering its price
- Stereo speakers
- Design
Cons- eMMC 5.1 Technology
- Glow
View original review- 8.1
- Screen8.0
- Performance9.0
- Camera7.2
- Connectivity8.3
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoIt's good for the price
If you are like me and you had a phone with less than 100 thousand points in antutu and you just wanted to play some games with your friends... well, if you are on a tight budget there is nothing better than this so far, the negative points so far are that it still lacks some features like the smart panel, some other options to customize it and so on, in the best case with one or several updates the lack of some options is corrected, but I repeat, if you want to play moderately demanding games at low graphics or just communicate... well, it is for you, it is a good phone, but it is not for demanding users
Pros- Screen Fluency
- Processor
- Battery
- Camera
Cons- Lack of configurations
- 10w charger in the box
View original review- 8
- Screen7.7
- Performance7.0
- Camera5.7
- Connectivity9.5
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 18 days ago
- Pros & Cons 4 months ago
- Version 11 months ago
- Width, Height, Weight, Inches, Density, Capacity (mAh), Fast charge, Operating System 1 year ago
- Name, RAM, Storage 1 year ago
- Features 1 year ago
- Thickness 1 year ago
- Aliases 1 year ago
- AnTuTu 1 year ago
- AnTuTu Version 1 year ago
Score
- 5.8 Design & Materials
- 5.5 Performance & Hardware
- 5.4 Camera
- 5.8 Connectivity
- 6.2 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
