you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Wileyfox Swift 2X reviews by real users Wileyfox Swift 2X
- 5.2"LCD IPSFHD16:9
- 155 g72.2 mm144.0 mm8.8 mm
- SnapD. 430 Octa-Core 3 GB RAM 32 GB
- v6 43.000
- 3010 mAh
- 1 16 Mpx · ƒ/2.0 S5K3P3 SELF 8 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow CyanogenMod 13.1 (Android 6.0.1 Marshmallow)
User score
- Screen6.9
- Performance6.3
- Camera6.1
- Connectivity7.4
- Battery7.0
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
3 reviews
3 reviews
3 reviews
3 reviews
Performance & Hardware
3 reviews
3 reviews
3 reviews
Camera
3 reviews
3 reviews
3 reviews
3 reviews
Connectivity
3 reviews
3 reviews
3 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 33%Less than a day
- 33%One day
- 33%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
3 reviews
Software
- 0%It comes with a clean operating system
- 100%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 0%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
3 reviews
- 0%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 33%Every six months
- 67%Every two months or less
3 reviews
User reviews
- AutoThe phone at the time of purchase was the best for its price, but now there are more interesting options
The phone has an excellent matrix, but the protective glass does not cope with the scratches from which you will have to buy a film, from behind which the glass on the sides will no longer be rounded. I would like to note the microphone, it constantly jamming different frequencies, for example high, like the speaker, which is pretty wheezy, but it is possible only with me, tk. out of the box worked fine. I'll say shortly about the cameras, the rear camera can do something and get to shoot when the phone was installed cyanogenmod (the operating system that was placed before android 7) now it is
View original review- 5.9
- Screen5.5
- Performance4.7
- Camera6.5
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery5.0
View answers - AutoMinuses are there, but in general, the smartphone is a real workhorse
The main trump card is the price. I needed an inexpensive smartphone so that I would not be too upset if I lost or broke. Chose between him and xiomi, but the 2nd is more fragile. On the parameters they are approximately equal. I bought it, I used it, I shoot it medium, I can not do photo wallpapers explicitly on such a camera, but there is enough for home video with the child. Iron is remarkable, it saves on travel. Everything is going and at good speeds and graphics. Communication is excellent, navigation, sensors are heard, batteries last for long. In a duet with a power bank, you can spend a week on a climb without a cutting tool
View original review- 9.4
- Screen9.5
- Performance9.3
- Camera8.5
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
Score
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.