you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
- 5.5"LCD IPSFHD16:9
- 163 g74.0 mm152.6 mm7.6 mm
- SnapD. 660 Octa-Core 6 GB RAM 64 GB
- v7 139.313
- 3500 mAh
- 1 12 Mpx · ƒ/1.8 IMX386 Exmor RS 2SELF 16 Mpx · ƒ/--
- Android 9.0 P MIUI V11 (Android 9 P)
User score
- 157
- 9
- 1
- 0
- 0
- Screen9.0
- Performance9.3
- Camera8.8
- Connectivity9.5
- Battery8.5
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
167 reviews
167 reviews
167 reviews
167 reviews
Performance & Hardware
167 reviews
167 reviews
167 reviews
Camera
167 reviews
167 reviews
167 reviews
167 reviews
Connectivity
167 reviews
167 reviews
167 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 2%Less than a day
- 25%One day
- 62%More than one day
- 11%Two days or more
167 reviews
Software
- 8%It comes with a clean operating system
- 80%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 12%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
167 reviews
- 0%Never
- 4%Once a year
- 60%Every six months
- 35%Every two months or less
167 reviews
User reviews
- Very Good phone
Design it's very modern and clean
Camera it's very detailed and clear
Selfie camera is superbPros- Compact
- Good Display
- Good Camera
- Selfie it's very clean and detail
- MIUI 12
Cons- Baterai life its average
- No night mode camera
- Sounds it's average
- 9.6
- Screen9.5
- Performance9.3
- Camera9.7
- Connectivity9.6
- Battery7.0
View answers - Well balanced smartphone at a low cost
It's good choice if u don't need high-end flagman device with high price.
Nice design, premium materials, strict design.
Energy efficient Snapdragon 660 and 3500mAh battery provide a long working time, and the performance is enough for all tasks and the most modern games.Pros- quality of main camera
- batterylife
- stereo speakers
- USB Type-C
- LCD IPS Display
- 6Gb Ram
Cons- back case maded from glass
- 10
- Screen9.5
- Performance7.6
- Camera10
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers - best mid range with balanced performance
there is nothing more to demand for the USD300 i spent
except ugly thick bezel, tats t only complain i hv. It would b a very welcomed merit to hv screen of 5.7" by reducing tat bezel.- 8.3
- Screen7.2
- Performance8.0
- Camera7.5
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 1 month ago
Score
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.