you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Xiaomi Redmi 13 reviews by real users Xiaomi Redmi 13
- "Ki" Value for Money Score7.3
- Pros
- Performance
Cons- Camera quality
- Night photos
- Price
- No good for gaming
- Slow SOC
- 6.79"LTPS LCDFHD+19.5:9
- 198 g76.3 mm168.6 mm8.2 mm
- Helio G91 Octa-Core 6 GB RAM 128 GB
- 269.266 v10
- 5030 mAh 33 W
- 1 108 Mpx ƒ/1.8 2 2 Mpx ƒ/2.4 SELF 13 Mpx · Unknow
- Android 14 Upside-down cake HyperOS (Android 14)
User reviews
User score
- 8
- 5
- 4
- 0
- 0
- Screen7.3
- Performance6.6
- Camera7.2
- Connectivity7.5
- Battery6.6
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Let me sum it up for you
Kimovil users believe it's a phone with excellent value for money, ideal for daily use and basic tasks. They highlight its attractive design and overall fluidity, though there are mixed opinions on its performance in demanding games.
Design & Materials
According to our users, the screen offers good quality, though brightness is an area for improvement. There are varied opinions on its type.
17 reviews
17 reviews
17 reviews
17 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, performance is fluid for daily tasks. However, for demanding games or continuous use, the Helio G91 Ultra processor falters and can overheat.
17 reviews
17 reviews
17 reviews
Camera
According to our users, the camera is generally good, especially during the day, but night photos and the 108MP feature generate mixed opinions.
17 reviews
17 reviews
17 reviews
17 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, connectivity is adequate, highlighting the presence of a 3.5mm jack and memory expansion. Opinions on the inclusion of NFC are varied.
17 reviews
17 reviews
17 reviews
Battery
According to our users, the battery is good for moderate use, but its duration is limited with intense use. The 33W fast charging is highly valued.
- 6%Less than half day
- 29%Less than a day
- 35%One day
- 29%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
17 reviews
Software
- 0%It comes with a clean operating system
- 76%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 24%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
17 reviews
- 0%Never
- 9%Once a year
- 73%Every six months
- 18%Every two months or less
17 reviews
- AutoThe processor is absurd
It's been the second worst device I've ever owned. It's incredibly slow, and it would be so easy to uninstall junk apps, but it comes with bloatware that you can't uninstall. The only redeeming feature is its resistance to heat, shocks, and scratches. I use it for a bit of everything, and it's been the most durable phone I've ever had (it fell from a second floor onto a rocky surface and held up perfectly; absolutely nothing broke). The battery and flash are decent and perform adequately.
View original review- 4.9
- Screen5.0
- Performance2.3
- Camera5.2
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery7.0
View answers - 9
- Screen8.7
- Performance8.6
- Camera6.7
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery9.0
View answers- AutoCalls and WhatsApp
It's a nice phone, it's comfortable, but the details are the speakers and the brightness, and I've had it for 4 months now and sometimes it takes a long time to enter an application and the camera, well, it's not bad either.
Pros- Camera
- Resistant
- It has an input for wired headphones
Cons- The battery
- Sound
- Glow
- You can't upload screen
View original review- 7.5
- Screen6.5
- Performance3.6
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity8.3
- Battery5.0
View answers - 7.2
- Screen8.0
- Performance7.6
- Camera8.2
- Connectivity7.6
- Battery5.0
View answers- AutoIt's going well for everyday life
What I don't like is its processor, thinking that I bought it because I thought it would have a better processor than the 13c but they are almost the same in performance, in games it is horrible that's why I don't use it for that. It has good screen quality, mine is Amoled not ips or oled, I have Android 15 and hyperOs 2.0. The camera leaves something to be desired, that 108 mp are for decoration and the sensor is average, not bad or good, but for the price I bought it I'm not saying anything, there were still better options. To think that they sell Samsungs with really bad specs at prices that don't match what they have, 128 GB for $ 370,000-$ 450,000 and with 4gb bad there.
View original review- 7
- Screen6.5
- Performance6.3
- Camera5.5
- Connectivity6.3
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 1 month ago
- Pros & Cons 4 months ago
- Bluetooth, Features 11 months ago
- Version 1 year ago
- Name, RAM 2 years ago
- Width, Height, Thickness, Weight, Camera, Camera, Camera 2 years ago
- Storage 2 years ago
- On Sale 2 years ago
- AnTuTu, Usable surface, Camera, Camera, Selfie Camera, Operating System, Processor, Flash, Sensor Model, Sensor Type, Sensor Model, Sensor Type, Sensor Model, Camera, Camera, Selfie Camera, Selfie Camera, Photos, Photos 2 years ago
- Aliases, Capacity (mAh), Fast charge 2 years ago
Score
- 6.9 Design & Materials
- 5.7 Performance & Hardware
- 5.9 Camera
- 6.4 Connectivity
- 6.3 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
