you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro reviews by real users Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
- "Ki" Value for Money Score8.3
- Pros
- Battery
- Design
- NFC
- Price
Cons- No wireless charging
- Night photos
- Ultrasonic proximity
- 6.67"AMOLEDQHD20:9
- 187 g74.2 mm161.1 mm8.0 mm
- SnapD. 7s Gen2 Octa-Core 8 GB RAM 128 GB
- 625.845 v10
- 5100 mAh 67 W
- 1 200 Mpx ƒ/1.65 2 8 Mpx ƒ/2.2 3 2 Mpx ƒ/2.4 SELF 16 Mpx · ƒ/2.4
- Android 15 HyperOS 2.X (Android 15)
User reviews
User score
- 79
- 13
- 6
- 1
- 0
- Screen8.6
- Performance8.5
- Camera8.1
- Connectivity8.8
- Battery7.5
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Let me sum it up for you
Kimovil users believe this smartphone offers excellent value for money, highlighting its impressive screen and the quality of its main camera. However, the software, especially HyperOS, and battery life generate divided opinions, with some reporting long-term performance and optimization issues.
Design & Materials
According to our users, the screen is magnificent, with vibrant colors, high 1.5K resolution and 120Hz, offering a high-end visual experience.
99 reviews
99 reviews
99 reviews
99 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, performance is adequate for daily use and gaming at medium quality. However, there are complaints about software optimization, bugs, and a degradation of fluidity over time.
99 reviews
99 reviews
99 reviews
Camera
According to our users, the 200MP main camera is excellent, with great detail. However, the secondary cameras and 4K video recording draw criticism, and the front camera could be improved.
99 reviews
99 reviews
99 reviews
99 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, connectivity is generally good, highlighting NFC and infrared. However, some report coverage issues and weak GPS.
99 reviews
99 reviews
99 reviews
Battery
According to our users, fast charging is excellent. However, battery life is a point of debate, with some reporting high consumption and others sufficient autonomy.
- 1%Less than half day
- 20%Less than a day
- 33%One day
- 40%More than one day
- 6%Two days or more
99 reviews
Software
- 3%It comes with a clean operating system
- 78%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 19%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
99 reviews
- 4%Never
- 6%Once a year
- 42%Every six months
- 49%Every two months or less
99 reviews
- Overall, to be honest, it's great for games too (Ultra Graphics too - Do Not Apply on High Quality games, this may result in lag)!Pros
- Charging speed
- Durability
- Weight
- Battery
- High Performance
- High Resolution photos
Cons- Battery drain
- Bloatwares
- No MicroSD Card slot
- No Wireless Charging
- 5.5
- Screen9.0
- Performance8.3
- Camera9.5
- Connectivity10
- Battery0.0
View answers - The review of my old phone
When I bought this phone I tested AnTuTu, Its good for the price. the camera is absolutely better than iPhone 16 pro max when I compared with it. when I was in cousins Iphone 14 pro max had 15x zoom and my phone had 10x zoom. I have compared the camera zoom. and iPhone just made it blurry but my redmi phone didnt so I can say the phone with camera is absolutely amazing! In games It runs PUBG on 60fps. also I can run genshin Impact on ultra graphics with 60 fps. but after a 20 min it overheats so I lose the fps. If you want this phone for gaming I'd recommend Poco X6 Pro.
Pros- This is an F/P Phone Legendary back in 2024.
- Camera Quality, Better than iPhone 16 pro max
- Runs Genshin Impact on Ultra graphics 60 fps.
- 700k AnTuTu Score
- Charge this phone less than 40 minutes (67w)
- 10x zoom and its not even loss quality.
Cons- Ultrawide camera loses quality
- %5 Chance of drop and lags
- Overheating on Roblox low graphics
- Not Optimized OS, Can batter ylost fast than usual
- 8.7
- Screen7.7
- Performance9.0
- Camera9.2
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery5.0
View answers - Great for a midrange device
It's an awesome phone for it's price but there are better options within it's price range. one key thing that i really dislike is when it's recording on 1080p 60fps it stutters and it's noticeable. although it takes great photos and videos at 1080p 30fps. it performs good in games especially in daily social media scrolling and the battery life is good and will last you a whole day on a single charge.
Pros- Great for it's price range
- Good performance
- Good camera for pictures
- Good camera for videos
- Great battery life
- Quite durable
Cons- Recording on 1080p 60fps is laggy
- Overheats especially under sunlight
- 8.5
- Screen8.0
- Performance8.3
- Camera8.7
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery7.0
View answers - It was good,the phone was smooth and i was first time for seeing the phone with dolby atmos without headphone
Design:good,smooth body and better look
Camera:sooo good,200MP is so detail,and the best part of camera is the low light and pro
Battery:good,67W fast charge, the time from 100% - 0% is more than 1 or 2 hour- 9.9
- Screen9.3
- Performance9.6
- Camera9.0
- Connectivity9.6
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 11 days ago
- Version 1 year ago
- Image gallery 1 year ago
- Features 1 year ago
- Operating System 2 years ago
- AnTuTu 2 years ago
- Selfie Camera 2 years ago
- Name, RAM 2 years ago
- Storage 2 years ago
- Aliases, Market 2 years ago
Score
- 8.1 Design & Materials
- 7.0 Performance & Hardware
- 7.4 Camera
- 8.0 Connectivity
- 7.1 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
