you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro reviews by real users Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
- Ki Cost-effective Score8.6
- Kimovil reviewPros
- Battery
- Design
- NFC
- Price
Cons- No Wireless charging
- Night photos
- Ultrasonic proximity
- 6.67"AMOLEDQHD20:9
- 187 g74.2 mm161.1 mm8.0 mm
- SnapD. 7s Gen2 Octa-Core 8 GB RAM 256 GB
- v10 625.845
- 5100 mAh
- 1 200 Mpx · ƒ/1.65 ISOCELL HP3 23SELF 16 Mpx · ƒ/2.4
- Android 13 Tiramisu MIUI 14 (Android 13)
User score
- 15
- 1
- 0
- 0
- 0
- Screen9.3
- Performance9.4
- Camera8.9
- Connectivity9.6
- Battery8.4
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
16 reviews
16 reviews
16 reviews
16 reviews
Performance & Hardware
16 reviews
16 reviews
16 reviews
Camera
16 reviews
16 reviews
16 reviews
16 reviews
Connectivity
16 reviews
16 reviews
16 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 13%Less than a day
- 6%One day
- 75%More than one day
- 6%Two days or more
16 reviews
Software
- 0%It comes with a clean operating system
- 100%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 0%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
16 reviews
- 0%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 30%Every six months
- 70%Every two months or less
16 reviews
User reviews
- AutoI bought it and am happy
I bought the Chinese version for the domestic market, the Xiaomi company makes it very high quality, and the kit is also generous, charging case, protective film Everything is a full set (headphones are missing) The seller put an adapter, I use this phone, all games run at 120 fps, the best sub-flagship that is available, I advise you in Chinese There are also Google services versions (if you live in Kazakhstan) but alas the battery can’t last very long even though the battery is huge but lol it eats up too much
Pros- Normal, what?
Cons- It would be better if they put 8000 instead of 5100 in such a phone with such a consuming percentage!
View original review- 8
- Screen10
- Performance10
- Camera10
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers - 9.6
- Screen9.7
- Performance9.3
- Camera9.2
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers- 9.8
- Screen10
- Performance9.6
- Camera9.2
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers- AutoVery versatile team
It has everything a common user needs for everyday life, if you like to play... you will also have excellent performance due to the combination of processor and GPU, without overheating or lags. The photos are very good for a $300 phone, the 1.5k screen is incredible in this Redmi line, I recommend it for all ages, it is a 4x4 device
Pros- High quality and bright screen
- Powerful processor
- Versatile camera
- Dolby atmos stereo sound
Cons- NOTHING
View original review- 9.8
- Screen9.5
- Performance10
- Camera9.0
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoExcellent option in relation to the price
Quite complete phone, I feel it is very balanced in many aspects. They highlight a very nice design to have a completely flat screen, a large screen with good clarity, brightness, fluidity and range of colors that I usually use with saturated colors for personal taste, stereo sound rich in detail and powerful, photographic quality that is quite good for its range, especially in the main camera, more than enough performance supported by the trust I have in Snapdragon platforms, which responds well in system navigation and playability, super fast charging with charger included (a compelling reason not to buy a Samsung equipment), Bluetooth audio compatible with several codecs, and a fairly competitive price, proof that the manufacturer has rescued its hallmark with this equipment, offering excellent features at the lowest possible price. As negative points I point out the autonomy, this is very average, causing a high battery consumption in non-demanding use, although I have seen comments where they point out that it can be improved by deactivating the RAM memory extension and the 120 Hz refresh rate. Other A point that I could say negative but not very evident is the front camera, it is very good in quality, but I feel that it could be better at handling backlit selfies and night selfies, since in these it falls somewhat behind the incredible quality of the night mode of the main chamber. These two points are forgivable for me due to the difficulty of managing the battery, mounting another type of front camera that would greatly increase the price to pay and the excellent hardware it has.
I initially thought of making some comments about the software, but it seems to me that it does not deserve the hate of the community and the press, since it offers an aesthetic that is not monotonous compared to other layers mounted on Android, and very simple usability. I would only criticize the number of updates, which is less compared to other brands.Pros- Rear camera
- Screen
- Performance
- Size
- Stable refresh rate
- stereo sound
Cons- Autonomy
- Low light night selfies
- Number of Android updates
View original review- 9.8
- Screen9.5
- Performance10
- Camera9.7
- Connectivity9.6
- Battery5.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 24 days ago
- Features 1 month ago
- AnTuTu 3 months ago
- Selfie Camera 3 months ago
- Version 3 months ago
- Name, RAM 3 months ago
- Storage 3 months ago
- Aliases, Market 3 months ago
- Image gallery 4 months ago
- Pros & Cons 4 months ago
Score
- 8.9 Design & Materials
- 7.4 Performance & Hardware
- 7.6 Camera
- 8.3 Connectivity
- 8.1 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.