you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 3 reviews by real users Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 3
- "Ki" Value for Money Score8.2
- Pros
- Design
- NFC
- Performance
Cons- No FM Radio
- No Google Services preinstalled
- Ultrasonic proximity
- 6.67"AMOLEDQHD20:9
- 179 g74.4 mm160.5 mm7.8 mm
- SnapD. 8s Gen3 Octa-Core 12 GB RAM 256 GB
- 1.782.215 v11
- 5000 mAh 90 W
- 1 50 Mpx ƒ/1.6 2 8 Mpx ƒ/2.2 SELF 20 Mpx · ƒ/2.0
- Android 14 Upside-down cake HyperOS (Android 14)
User reviews
User score
- 15
- 0
- 1
- 0
- 0
- Screen9.0
- Performance9.3
- Camera8.1
- Connectivity8.8
- Battery7.4
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Let me sum it up for you
Kimovil users consider it an excellent phone for its price-quality ratio, highlighting its power for gaming and daily use. There's a general consensus that it offers outstanding performance for its range. However, some mention issues with the Chinese ROM, notifications, and bloatware, although others consider it a wonderful device.
Design & Materials
According to our users, the 2K AMOLED screen is fluid, bright, and visible in sunlight. Although some report it is prone to burn-in.
16 reviews
16 reviews
16 reviews
16 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 offers fluid and powerful performance for demanding games, with hardly any overheating.
16 reviews
16 reviews
16 reviews
Camera
According to our users, the main camera is decent in good light, but the ultra-wide-angle is deficient. Opinions on video are diverse.
16 reviews
16 reviews
16 reviews
16 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, connectivity is a weak point. They report problems with mobile networks and NFC, recommending checking compatibility.
16 reviews
16 reviews
16 reviews
Battery
According to our users, the 5000mAh battery offers great autonomy and charges very quickly. Updates have improved its duration.
- 0%Less than half day
- 6%Less than a day
- 69%One day
- 25%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
16 reviews
Software
- 0%It comes with a clean operating system
- 81%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 19%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
16 reviews
- 0%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 58%Every six months
- 42%Every two months or less
16 reviews
- Performance, gaming, camera quality, the screen are awesome, the battery is good enough.
Design is nice, battery is good enough for whole day, if you play hard games like PUBG and Genshin Impact, battery consumption will be more than usual, but you can charge your phone from 20% up to 100% within half hour.
Pros- Smooth display
- Performance
- Charging speed
- Design
- Weight
- Price
- 9.9
- Screen9.7
- Performance10
- Camera10
- Connectivity9.6
- Battery7.0
View answers - Extremely good for the price
for less than 300€ it's and absolute steal. It has the snapdragon 8s gen 3 that makes daily use and gaming (even COD with max settings) super easy. I never experienced a lag. The phone doesn't really heat up, in my home town Venice, Italy it get slightly warm when playing demanding games but that's it. Photos are ok (the phone is a mainly performance one) and even at night are acceptable. If you have a steady hand you can get nice pics at night. The display is good and has 120hz
Pros- performance
- smoothness
- UI
- day photos
Cons- night photos in some scenarios
- video
- 8.9
- Screen9.0
- Performance10
- Camera8.5
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoGreat phone for the price (>200€ new)
I've been using this phone for six months and recommend it to everyone. The screen is a vibrant 2K AMOLED, very smooth and bright, and everything is visible in sunlight. The cheap screen does fade quickly, but if that's not an issue, it's perfectly acceptable. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 processor handles all games and doesn't overheat in everyday use. The phone is truly powerful, making it a joy to play any game. The cameras are pretty average, although if you have the space and plenty of daylight, you can capture some decent footage. The ultra-wide-angle camera is poor, a bummer; you don't even need to use it. The front camera is adequate. The 5000mAh battery lasts a long time: I got 7 hours on LTE and 10-11 hours on Wi-Fi, and it charges from zero to 100 in 35 minutes. For those who are worried about battery life, yes, it used to barely last 6 hours on Wi-Fi, but with updates all the bugs have been fixed and it holds up great and doesn't heat up.
Pros- Screen
- CPU
- Autonomy
- Charger
- Set
- OS
Cons- Cameras
- Sound
View original review- 10
- Screen10
- Performance9.6
- Camera8.0
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers - AutoExcellent smartphone for gaming
Smart purely for games. The chipset is well implemented, does not throttle. The main camera is normal, but the wide-angle is a little soapy and dim, as it seems to me. But in general, I did not notice a big difference with my previous rn9, which I bought for 11k, except for stabilization. Hyper OS is great for it, only visual bugs. 4G connection is poorly received only in the Russian office. In a word, for a budget of up to 25k everything is great, it's a pity that bootloader unlocking is only paid PS Compared the pictures, the camera is quite good, much better than my old smartphone. In good conditions with a Google camera, the pictures are about sub-flagship level
Pros- Performance
- Hyper
- Screen
- Case
Cons- Unlock bootloader
- Hyper
View original review- 9.2
- Screen7.2
- Performance8.6
- Camera6.0
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 4 days ago
- Name 1 year ago
- Version 1 year ago
- RAM 1 year ago
- Battery Composition 1 year ago
- AnTuTu 2 years ago
- Screen Type 2 years ago
- Features 2 years ago
- On Sale 2 years ago
- Pros & Cons 2 years ago
Score
- 7.6 Design & Materials
- 8.1 Performance & Hardware
- 7.2 Camera
- 6.5 Connectivity
- 6.6 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
