you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
Honor 400 Lite reviews by real users HONOR 400 Lite
- "Ki" Value for Money Score8
- EfficiencyBGAA B C D EA B C D E
- Pros
- Battery
Cons- Camera quality
- Video quality
- Price
- No good for gaming
- Slow SOC
- 6.7"AMOLEDFHD+20:9
- 171 g74.6 mm161.0 mm7.3 mm
- Dimensity 7025 Octa-Core 8 GB RAM 256 GB
- 470.000 v10
- 5230 mAh 35 W ~ 49h
- 1 108 Mpx ƒ/1.75 2 5 Mpx ƒ/2.2 SELF 16 Mpx · ƒ/2.5
- Android 15 Android 15
User reviews
User score
- 8
- 4
- 1
- 2
- 0
- Screen8.2
- Performance7.2
- Camera6.9
- Connectivity8.2
- Battery6.8
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Let me sum it up for you
Kimovil users believe this smartphone offers good value for money, highlighting its fluidity in daily use and an attractive design. Many appreciate its long-term update support. However, there are divided opinions on its overall performance, considering it disappointing for its price range.
Design & Materials
According to our users, the 120Hz screen offers acceptable quality for multimedia, with sharp colors and high brightness, making it a strong point.
15 reviews
15 reviews
15 reviews
15 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, performance is fluid for daily use and multitasking, but disappoints in demanding games. The processor generates mixed opinions.
15 reviews
15 reviews
15 reviews
Camera
According to our users, the 108MP main camera is good in light, but lacks OIS and struggles at night. The absence of 4K is criticized.
15 reviews
15 reviews
15 reviews
15 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, they value its drop resistance. However, the IP65 rating is insufficient for water and it lacks an SD card slot.
15 reviews
15 reviews
15 reviews
Battery
According to our users, the battery is fantastic, lasting a full day or more with normal use. Most rate it positively, although there is some criticism.
- 7%Less than half day
- 20%Less than a day
- 40%One day
- 33%More than one day
- 0%Two days or more
15 reviews
Software
- 0%It comes with a clean operating system
- 73%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 27%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
15 reviews
- 10%Never
- 0%Once a year
- 30%Every six months
- 60%Every two months or less
15 reviews
- I like it.
I recomand this phone for european people that are broke or dont have alot of money because it have 6 years of security patch and major upgrades. The OS its fine, every day use its good, only for gaming its not really good, its hard to get more than 60FPS , depends on the game but you can get and under 60FPS.
And everything else depends on you (remeber to go to manager sistem and click on "optimization" Because its helps alot if your device start lagging (i dont mean videogames) and can help alot if you have some viruse. )Pros- High refresh rate
- Big PWM
- long support for European continent atleast
- Price
Cons- Performance
- 7.2
- Screen7.7
- Performance7.6
- Camera7.5
- Connectivity8.0
- Battery9.0
View answers - Disappointing
I had this month for a month and a half, and honestly, would rather buy Samsung A36 5G or S23 FE off the market. Antutu score is horrible for its price, the performance in games is dissapointing. It's alright for the everyday use, but definitely not for the high end games. It does not require the meetings for its price. The OS is nice, I like the animations, it's just alright. The main problem is the hardware.
Pros- Design
- Animations
- Customization
Cons- Hardware
- Perfomance
- Battery usage
- 3
- Screen6.7
- Performance4.6
- Camera3.6
- Connectivity7.0
- Battery5.0
View answers - 10
- Screen10
- Performance10
- Camera7.5
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers- AutoIt could be better, but it's not that bad.
I had it for a few months as a secondary device and I think it performs well for everyday use. Social media browsing is adequate, and the screen is more than acceptable for multimedia consumption, but it lacks better sound, as it doesn't have stereo speakers. You can take good photos with the main camera in good lighting conditions, but it struggles at night, especially since it doesn't have OIS on any of its cameras, which is undoubtedly one of its weakest points. Interestingly, it has a camera control button very similar to Apple's and also includes a front-facing flash for selfies. In Mexico, the official version came with 12GB of RAM, which I think is one of its strongest features. It doesn't close background apps, and you can open several without it slowing down, and it doesn't overheat either. Gaming performance is decent; it doesn't freeze, but the experience isn't always smooth, and the processor doesn't help. The good thing is that the battery lasts all day, sometimes a little longer depending on usage, and the charger is included in the box. It already has SGS certification. It's not as rugged as other models from the same brand, but having dropped it a couple of times, I can say it holds up well. However, it does have an IP65 rating, so it's NOT AS WATER RESISTANT as some other devices in this price range. Design-wise, I find it very attractive; it's slim, lightweight, and comfortable to hold. It looks and feels like a more expensive device. There's not much more to add. As I said in the title, it could be better, but it's not bad, and for the price, it's fine.
Pros- The screen
- The design. It's nice and slim.
- 12GB of physical RAM
- SGS Certification
- The battery
Cons- The cameras do not have OIS.
- The processor
- It does not have stereo sound.
- IP65 rating, it lacks water resistance
View original review- 8
- Screen9.2
- Performance8.0
- Camera8.2
- Connectivity10
- Battery9.0
View answers - AutoA good phone can be used for normal gaming
It's a very good modern phone with many features.
Pros- Acceptable duration
- Drop resistance
- Light water resistance
- It doesn't stand out quickly
- Camera functions
- High brightness and good network
Cons- It doesn't load with bad internet signals.
- Device guide problems
View original review- 8.5
- Screen7.5
- Performance4.6
- Camera7.0
- Connectivity4.6
- Battery9.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 18 days ago
- Pros & Cons 3 months ago
- Features 6 months ago
- Version 9 months ago
- Name, Aliases, RAM 9 months ago
- On Sale 1 year ago
- Width, Selfie Camera, Selfie Camera, SIM card 1 year ago
- Release date 1 year ago
- Usable surface 1 year ago
- Density, Camera, Selfie Camera, Capacity (mAh), Market, Storage, Sensor Model, Sensor Type, Camera, Camera, Photos, Photos 1 year ago
Score
- 7.1 Design & Materials
- 6.5 Performance & Hardware
- 6.9 Camera
- 7.2 Connectivity
- 7.3 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
