you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
Add devices to your profile, rate and comment on your smartphones...
POCO F5 reviews by real users Poco F5
- Ki Cost-effective Score8.9
- Kimovil reviewPros
- Battery
- Camera quality
- Display quality
- Performance
Cons- No water and dust protection
- Selfie camera
- No MicroSD slot
- 6.67"AMOLEDFHD+20:9
- 181 g74.9 mm161.1 mm7.9 mm
- SnapD. 7+ Gen2 Octa-Core 8 GB RAM 256 GB
- v10 1.134.558
- 5000 mAh
- 1 64 Mpx · ƒ/1.79 OV64B 23SELF 16 Mpx · ƒ/2.45
- Android 13 Tiramisu MIUI 14 (Android 13)
User score
- 136
- 13
- 3
- 0
- 0
- Screen8.9
- Performance9.3
- Camera8.1
- Connectivity9.3
- Battery8.3
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Design & Materials
152 reviews
152 reviews
152 reviews
152 reviews
Performance & Hardware
152 reviews
152 reviews
152 reviews
Camera
152 reviews
152 reviews
152 reviews
152 reviews
Connectivity
152 reviews
152 reviews
152 reviews
Battery
- 0%Less than half day
- 5%Less than a day
- 30%One day
- 59%More than one day
- 6%Two days or more
152 reviews
Software
- 3%It comes with a clean operating system
- 86%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 11%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
152 reviews
- 0%Never
- 2%Once a year
- 47%Every six months
- 51%Every two months or less
152 reviews
User reviews
- Almost Perfect Phone, Good enough. Great Camera, Very Good Performance.
The design is very Simpel but Elegant, performance? Ah, don't ask again. It's very good, 7+ Gen 2 Pretty good for the price. Camera? Pretty good, stabilizer is equipped, but only 1080p with 60 fps. 4k 30 fps. Pretty good. Battery? I'm very disappointed to say this, after a while I bought this F5, I think the battery drains quite quickly. Very disappointed but it's okay. I decided to use battery saver. It's good to solve that problem, but I'm still disappointed. ):
Pros- Performance
- Design
- Sound
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Screen
Cons- Battery
- 8.9
- Screen9.0
- Performance10
- Camera8.2
- Connectivity9.0
- Battery5.0
View answers - Great phone for a great price, fast and smooth.
For normal daily use you don't need more power then this one. I've got the 12gb version. Had never any lag with lots of apps open at same time. The phone is lot more slim then the X3pro wich I had before. (also great phone by the way) The 7 gen 2 processor is doing a great job. Only downside is the camera. I would love to see a Sony or Samsung in it instead of omnivision. I also had a regular x3 wich has a Sony imx686 and made better pictures then the F5.
But the phone itself is great and I recommended to everyone.Pros- Fast and stable
- No lags
- Thin
- Sound
- Battery
- 67 watt charger(included)
Cons- Camera(rear)
- Display could have been brighter in daylight.
- 9.5
- Screen9.7
- Performance9.6
- Camera7.5
- Connectivity9.6
- Battery10
View answers - Very good Smartphone for Gaming.
The design is very simple, but I'm comfortable with it. Battery, umm... I bought this a few months ago, the battery is getting more and more wasteful day by day but that's not the case. Power
Pros- Performance
- Camera
- Design
- Battery
- Quality
Cons- 9.3
- Screen8.7
- Performance10
- Camera7.5
- Connectivity10
- Battery5.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 11 days ago
- SIM card 5 months ago
- Features 5 months ago
- Camera 6 months ago
- Version 7 months ago
- AnTuTu Version 7 months ago
- AnTuTu 7 months ago
- Pros & Cons 9 months ago
- Camera 10 months ago
- Screen Type 11 months ago
Score
- 8.8 Design & Materials
- 8.3 Performance & Hardware
- 7.4 Camera
- 8.0 Connectivity
- 7.6 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.