you will be able to check alert messages here.
- No alerts
- Browse without ads
- Ask Kim AI
- Review devices
- My wish lists...
POCO F5 reviews by real users POCO F5
- "Ki" Value for Money Score8.2
- Pros
- Battery
- Camera quality
- Display quality
- Performance
Cons- No water and dust protection
- Selfie camera
- No MicroSD slot
- 6.67"AMOLEDFHD+20:9
- 181 g74.9 mm161.1 mm7.9 mm
- SnapD. 7+ Gen2 Octa-Core 8 GB RAM 256 GB
- 1.134.558 v10
- 5000 mAh 67 W
- 1 64 Mpx ƒ/1.79 2 8 Mpx ƒ/2.2 3 2 Mpx ƒ/2.4 SELF 16 Mpx · ƒ/2.45
- Android 15 HyperOS 3.X (Android 15)
User reviews
User score
- 181
- 26
- 4
- 1
- 0
- Screen8.7
- Performance9.1
- Camera7.7
- Connectivity9.2
- Battery7.9
It'll only take a minute, you'll help people decide.
Let me sum it up for you
Kimovil users consider the Poco F5 a "king" of the mid-premium range, highlighting its exceptional value for money. They appreciate its power and fluidity for daily use and gaming, although some mention that the build materials could be improved, and there are diverse opinions regarding overheating and updates.
Design & Materials
According to our users, the 120Hz AMOLED screen is excellent, with good resolution and vivid colors. However, some point out that brightness under sunlight and color calibration could be improved.
212 reviews
212 reviews
212 reviews
212 reviews
Performance & Hardware
According to our users, performance is outstanding thanks to the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, running demanding games and applications smoothly. Although some notice overheating in intense games, the overall performance is highly praised.
212 reviews
212 reviews
212 reviews
Camera
According to our users, the cameras are decent for daytime use, but the front camera and night photos are weak points. Quality significantly improves with a Gcam, although 4K 60fps recording is not available.
212 reviews
212 reviews
212 reviews
212 reviews
Connectivity
According to our users, connectivity is good, including 5G and NFC. They highlight the presence of a 3.5mm jack and IR blaster, although mobile network reception can be weak in some areas.
212 reviews
212 reviews
212 reviews
Battery
According to our users, the battery offers good daily autonomy and 67W fast charging. However, some report degradation over time and faster consumption with intense use or after updates.
- 1%Less than half day
- 9%Less than a day
- 34%One day
- 50%More than one day
- 5%Two days or more
212 reviews
Software
- 2%It comes with a clean operating system
- 83%It has preinstalled apps but they don't bother me
- 14%It has preinstalled apps that I can't uninstall
212 reviews
- 0%Never
- 5%Once a year
- 51%Every six months
- 44%Every two months or less
212 reviews
- It's just cool. I buy it , 2.5 years ago, but it's so fast and and super.
Camera : good , but not enough
Performance: it's good for 2026, but not super.
Battery: bit a not good, because itʼs using less 1 day
But this smartphone just comfortable.
(Sorry, my English so badPros- Performance best in crdroid
- Display
- Speaker
- IR blaster
Cons- Hyperos 2.0.218.0 global not good, there lags
- Battery bit a fast spending
- 10
- Screen9.7
- Performance10
- Camera8.2
- Connectivity10
- Battery7.0
View answers - Good phone for gaming considering the price
This phone makes 2 years with me in November, so do take that in consideration when reading.
I play a lot of games at max graphics, so I usually drain the battery in 3 or less hours in these conditions. The temperature of the phone can get quite high due to its poor heat dissipation, specially in the area besides the cameras. Daily normal use still gives me about the full day, and about 4-5 hours of continuously watching videos. Of course the battery drains faster than when it was new, but it still holds good.
The performance is really good still, it can run most popular games at high graphics without problem, max graphics you will get frame drops sometimes, but pretty manageable.
The Main camera is good. Selfie camera is just meh.
The screen started to get a little bit dim compared as when it was new, but it is only noticeable while trying to see it under the sun.
Speakers are kinda loud, but they get saturated easily and are not the best quality sound.Pros- Performance
- Price
- Main Camera
- Battery
Cons- Screen
- Speakers
- Temperature control
- 8.1
- Screen8.2
- Performance8.6
- Camera7.2
- Connectivity8.6
- Battery7.0
View answers
This service may contain translations powered by Google. Google disclaims all warranties related to the translations, express or implied, including any warranties of accuracy, reliability, and any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement.
- Rumor
- Presell
- New
- On Sale
- New opinion 8 days ago
- Operating System 27 days ago
- Features 1 year ago
- SIM card 2 years ago
- Camera 2 years ago
- Version 2 years ago
- AnTuTu Version 2 years ago
- AnTuTu 2 years ago
- Pros & Cons 3 years ago
- Camera 3 years ago
Score
- 7.9 Design & Materials
- 7.6 Performance & Hardware
- 7.3 Camera
- 7.7 Connectivity
- 6.7 Battery
In this case, to determine the score we evaluate 5 general aspects:
- Design and screen
- Hardware and performance
- Camera
- Connectivity
- Battery
Once these 5 factors have been rated, we introduce the price variable. This means that any two devices with the same ratings get a different Ki score for quality vs price.
Even a device objectively worse than another may have a higher Ki score if it has a better price.
The Ki varies as time goes by. As new devices with better specifications enter the market the Ki score of older devices will go down, always being compensated of their decrease in price.
